Exploring the interplay of management, quality and ethics in addressing gender and school-based disparities in students’ research self-efficacy and anxiety

The study sought to examine the gender, faculty and school-based disparity that exists in students’ research self-efficacy, perception of ethics in research and the level of stress they face in conducting research. A sample of 385 undergraduate students from the faculty of business and hospitality were selected from three public universities in Ghana, namely the University of Education, Winneba, Takoradi Technical University and Kumasi Technical University (UEW, TTU and KsTU). The Logit regression model, Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square of association were employed for the analysis. The findings indicate that 68.4% of female students reported higher research self-efficacy compared to 57.2% of males, showing a significant gender disparity (p < 0.05). Regarding research ethics, 75.6% of students relied on past research works, with notable differences across faculties (p = 0.03). Perceptions of plagiarism detection software availability revealed that 62.8% of KsTU students believed the software was accessible compared to 48.2% and 50.6% for UEW and TTU, respectively (p < 0.01). Additionally, 58.3% of students cited limited access to supervisors as a major challenge, with hospitality students experiencing higher stress levels (72.1%) compared to business students (54.5%) (p < 0.001). However, all students experienced stress in undertaking research. The findings further indicated that there was a gender-based disparity in all of the assessment factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Education
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00518-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the interplay of management, quality and ethics in addressing gender and school-based disparities in students’ research self-efficacy and anxiety

Maame Afua Nkrumah, Ronald Osei Mensah, Alwyna Sackey Addaquay
2 citations
Discover Education
Innovations in Medical Education
3.76
article

Exploring the interplay of management, quality and ethics in addressing gender and school-based disparities in students’ research self-efficacy and anxiety

Maame Afua Nkrumah, Ronald Osei Mensah, Alwyna Sackey Addaquay
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The study sought to examine the gender, faculty and school-based disparity that exists in students’ research self-efficacy, perception of ethics in research and the level of stress they face in conducting research. A sample of 385 undergraduate students from the faculty of business and hospitality were selected from three public universities in Ghana, namely the University of Education, Winneba, Takoradi Technical University and Kumasi Technical University (UEW, TTU and KsTU). The Logit regression model, Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square of association were employed for the analysis. The findings indicate that 68.4% of female students reported higher research self-efficacy compared to 57.2% of males, showing a significant gender disparity (p < 0.05). Regarding research ethics, 75.6% of students relied on past research works, with notable differences across faculties (p = 0.03). Perceptions of plagiarism detection software availability revealed that 62.8% of KsTU students believed the software was accessible compared to 48.2% and 50.6% for UEW and TTU, respectively (p < 0.01). Additionally, 58.3% of students cited limited access to supervisors as a major challenge, with hospitality students experiencing higher stress levels (72.1%) compared to business students (54.5%) (p < 0.001). However, all students experienced stress in undertaking research. The findings further indicated that there was a gender-based disparity in all of the assessment factors.

Discover EducationVol. 4(1)
University of Cape Coast (GH), Takoradi Technical University (GH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovations in Medical Education
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.