Postoperative Analgesia with Ropivacaine-Fentanyl versus Ropivacaine-Morphine after Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section

Objective: To compare postoperative analgesia after spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine + fentanyl versus ropivacaine + morphine. Methods: A prospective, randomized, observational study was conducted with a total of 64 patients undergoing emergency cesarean section. Patients were divided into two groups: group F (isobaric ropivacaine + fentanyl) and group M (isobaric ropivacaine + morphine). Clinical, demographic, and hemodynamic data were collected. Pain intensity using the Number Rating Scale (NRS) was assessed both at rest and during movement for up to 24 hours postoperatively. Adverse effects were also recorded. Results: The fall in blood pressure after anesthesia induction was greater in group F. Intraoperative pain was more frequent in group M (p = 0.015), with a mean onset time of 37.69 ± 4.42 minutes. The frequency of pruritus was significantly higher in group F; (37.50%) compared to group M (3.13%). During the first 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively, pain intensity both at rest and with movement was lower in group M. Conclusion: The combination of intrathecal ropivacaine and morphine demonstrated better hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia, with fewer adverse effects, making it an effective and safe option for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biosciences and Medicines
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2025.135010
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative Analgesia with Ropivacaine-Fentanyl versus Ropivacaine-Morphine after Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section

J. Marquez, Juan Munguía López, Ana Flores, Francisco Betanzos Ramírez et al.
Journal of Biosciences and Medicines
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Postoperative Analgesia with Ropivacaine-Fentanyl versus Ropivacaine-Morphine after Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section

J. Marquez, Juan Munguía López, Ana Flores, Francisco Betanzos Ramírez, Leonor I. Parra Flores, Melinda González Concepción, E. Domínguez, Rafael Taracena Rodrguez
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare postoperative analgesia after spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine + fentanyl versus ropivacaine + morphine. Methods: A prospective, randomized, observational study was conducted with a total of 64 patients undergoing emergency cesarean section. Patients were divided into two groups: group F (isobaric ropivacaine + fentanyl) and group M (isobaric ropivacaine + morphine). Clinical, demographic, and hemodynamic data were collected. Pain intensity using the Number Rating Scale (NRS) was assessed both at rest and during movement for up to 24 hours postoperatively. Adverse effects were also recorded. Results: The fall in blood pressure after anesthesia induction was greater in group F. Intraoperative pain was more frequent in group M (p = 0.015), with a mean onset time of 37.69 ± 4.42 minutes. The frequency of pruritus was significantly higher in group F; (37.50%) compared to group M (3.13%). During the first 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively, pain intensity both at rest and with movement was lower in group M. Conclusion: The combination of intrathecal ropivacaine and morphine demonstrated better hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia, with fewer adverse effects, making it an effective and safe option for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section.

Journal of Biosciences and MedicinesVol. 13(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.