Impact of Distal Tibiofibular Joint Anatomy on Reduction Outcome in Dynamic Suture Button Stabilization of the Distal Syndesmosis—A CT Analysis

Introduction: The anatomy of the distal tibiofibular joint (DTFJ) has been demonstrated to influence the radiological outcome of reduction with syndesmotic screw fixation in the course of ankle fracture treatment. The objective of this study was to describe the anatomy of the DTFJ and to analyze the effect of incisura anatomy on syndesmotic stabilization with suture button systems (SBS), also in the context of their flexible nature of fixation. Materials and Methods: Forty-four (21 females, 23 males) consecutive postoperative bilateral computed tomography scans after stabilization of the DTFJ by SBS in the course of operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures were retrospectively analyzed. The anatomy of the DTFJ was evaluated by examining the following parameters: depth of the tibial incisura (DI), rotation of the incisura (ROI), Nault talar dome angle (NTDA), Leporjärvi clear space (LCS), anterior tibiofibular distance (antTFD), and fibula engagement (FE). The side-to-side (Δ) of LCS, NTDA, and antTFD, which analyzed the reduction result, were correlated with DI, FE, ROI, and NTDA, as well as the transverse offset (TO), reflecting the flexible nature of fixation. Results: Patients with slight overtightening (ΔLCS > −1 mm) showed a fibula that protruded less into the incisura on the native side (smaller FE) compared to symmetrical reduced patients and to patients with slight diastasis (p < 0.05). There was no relationship between the parameters describing the anatomy of the incisura and parameters assessing the parameter of the “flexible nature of fixation” (rs < 0.300). Regarding the anatomical parameters, it was observed that there were inter-individual differences of more than 4 mm (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The considerable inter-individual anatomical variability of the DTFJ was confirmed. The morphological configuration of the incisura has no impact on the immediate radiological reduction result after SBS stabilization of the DTFG, as determined by CT. The extent of the flexible nature of fixation is also not affected by the morphology of the incisura. Stabilization of the DTFJ can be performed regardless of the anatomical configuration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma Care
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare5020010
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Distal Tibiofibular Joint Anatomy on Reduction Outcome in Dynamic Suture Button Stabilization of the Distal Syndesmosis—A CT Analysis

Annette Ahrberg-Spiegl, Christian Kleber, Firas Souleiman, Ulrich Spiegl et al.
Trauma Care
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Impact of Distal Tibiofibular Joint Anatomy on Reduction Outcome in Dynamic Suture Button Stabilization of the Distal Syndesmosis—A CT Analysis

Annette Ahrberg-Spiegl, Christian Kleber, Firas Souleiman, Ulrich Spiegl, Carolin Fuchs, Robert Hennings, Henkelmann Jeanette
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The anatomy of the distal tibiofibular joint (DTFJ) has been demonstrated to influence the radiological outcome of reduction with syndesmotic screw fixation in the course of ankle fracture treatment. The objective of this study was to describe the anatomy of the DTFJ and to analyze the effect of incisura anatomy on syndesmotic stabilization with suture button systems (SBS), also in the context of their flexible nature of fixation. Materials and Methods: Forty-four (21 females, 23 males) consecutive postoperative bilateral computed tomography scans after stabilization of the DTFJ by SBS in the course of operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures were retrospectively analyzed. The anatomy of the DTFJ was evaluated by examining the following parameters: depth of the tibial incisura (DI), rotation of the incisura (ROI), Nault talar dome angle (NTDA), Leporjärvi clear space (LCS), anterior tibiofibular distance (antTFD), and fibula engagement (FE). The side-to-side (Δ) of LCS, NTDA, and antTFD, which analyzed the reduction result, were correlated with DI, FE, ROI, and NTDA, as well as the transverse offset (TO), reflecting the flexible nature of fixation. Results: Patients with slight overtightening (ΔLCS > −1 mm) showed a fibula that protruded less into the incisura on the native side (smaller FE) compared to symmetrical reduced patients and to patients with slight diastasis (p < 0.05). There was no relationship between the parameters describing the anatomy of the incisura and parameters assessing the parameter of the “flexible nature of fixation” (rs < 0.300). Regarding the anatomical parameters, it was observed that there were inter-individual differences of more than 4 mm (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The considerable inter-individual anatomical variability of the DTFJ was confirmed. The morphological configuration of the incisura has no impact on the immediate radiological reduction result after SBS stabilization of the DTFG, as determined by CT. The extent of the flexible nature of fixation is also not affected by the morphology of the incisura. Stabilization of the DTFJ can be performed regardless of the anatomical configuration.

Trauma CareVol. 5(2)
University Hospital Leipzig (DE), München Klinik Harlaching (DE)
Universität Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.