MultiStageSearch: An Iterative Workflow for Unbiased Taxonomic Analysis of Pathogens Using Proteogenomics

The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic emphasized the need for accurate pathogen diagnostics. While genomics is the gold standard, integrating mass spectrometry-based proteomics offers additional benefits. However, current proteomic and genomic reference databases are often biased toward specific taxa, such as pathogenic strains or model organisms, and proteomic databases are less comprehensive. These biases and gaps can lead to inaccurate identifications. To address these issues, we introduce MultiStageSearch, a multistep database search method that combines proteome and genome databases for taxonomic analysis. Initially, a generalist proteome database is used to infer potential species. Then, MultiStageSearch generates a specialized proteogenomic database for precise identification. This database is preprocessed to filter duplicates and cluster identical open reading frames to reduce genomic database biases. The workflow operates independently of strain-level NCBI taxonomy, enabling the identification of strains not represented in existing taxonomies. We benchmarked the workflow on viral and bacterial samples, demonstrating its superior performance in strain-level taxonomic inference compared to existing methods. MultiStageSearch offers a flexible and accurate approach for pathogen research and diagnostics, overcoming incomplete search spaces and biases inherent in reference databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00901
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MultiStageSearch: An Iterative Workflow for Unbiased Taxonomic Analysis of Pathogens Using Proteogenomics

Lennart Martens, Tanja Holstein, Thilo Muth, Julian Pipart
1 citations
Journal of Proteome Research
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
0.81
article

MultiStageSearch: An Iterative Workflow for Unbiased Taxonomic Analysis of Pathogens Using Proteogenomics

Lennart Martens, Tanja Holstein, Thilo Muth, Julian Pipart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic emphasized the need for accurate pathogen diagnostics. While genomics is the gold standard, integrating mass spectrometry-based proteomics offers additional benefits. However, current proteomic and genomic reference databases are often biased toward specific taxa, such as pathogenic strains or model organisms, and proteomic databases are less comprehensive. These biases and gaps can lead to inaccurate identifications. To address these issues, we introduce MultiStageSearch, a multistep database search method that combines proteome and genome databases for taxonomic analysis. Initially, a generalist proteome database is used to infer potential species. Then, MultiStageSearch generates a specialized proteogenomic database for precise identification. This database is preprocessed to filter duplicates and cluster identical open reading frames to reduce genomic database biases. The workflow operates independently of strain-level NCBI taxonomy, enabling the identification of strains not represented in existing taxonomies. We benchmarked the workflow on viral and bacterial samples, demonstrating its superior performance in strain-level taxonomic inference compared to existing methods. MultiStageSearch offers a flexible and accurate approach for pathogen research and diagnostics, overcoming incomplete search spaces and biases inherent in reference databases.

Journal of Proteome ResearchVol. 24(6)
Robert Koch Institute (DE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Supply Chain Competence Center (Germany) (DE), VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology (BE), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Joachim Herz Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universiteit Gent, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.