The Advance on Costs in International Arbitration and the Scope of Tribunal Discretion

p class="MsoNormal"This article examines the issues that arise when a respondent defaults on the advance on costs in international arbitration. It provides an overview of the advance on costs provisions contained within various arbitral institutional rules, with a particular focus on mechanisms addressing a respondent’s failure to pay their share. This article also discusses the legal basis of the obligation to pay the advance on costs. In this regard, it explores the different remedies available to nondefaulting parties when seeking reimbursement of their substitute payment. The remainder of the article discusses the scope of the arbitral tribunals’ discretion in deciding whether to issue an order or award for reimbursement. The authors consider which circumstances may justify a respondent’s default on the advance on costs, drawing upon existing arbitral jurisprudence and related caselaw. The analysis highlights the lack of explicit guidance in most institutional rules and the implications of this uncertainty for tribunals and parties.o:p/o:p

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Arbitration
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2025029
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Advance on Costs in International Arbitration and the Scope of Tribunal Discretion

M Bérard, Micha Schwartzshtein
Journal of International Arbitration
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

The Advance on Costs in International Arbitration and the Scope of Tribunal Discretion

M Bérard, Micha Schwartzshtein
article en

Abstract

p class="MsoNormal"This article examines the issues that arise when a respondent defaults on the advance on costs in international arbitration. It provides an overview of the advance on costs provisions contained within various arbitral institutional rules, with a particular focus on mechanisms addressing a respondent’s failure to pay their share. This article also discusses the legal basis of the obligation to pay the advance on costs. In this regard, it explores the different remedies available to nondefaulting parties when seeking reimbursement of their substitute payment. The remainder of the article discusses the scope of the arbitral tribunals’ discretion in deciding whether to issue an order or award for reimbursement. The authors consider which circumstances may justify a respondent’s default on the advance on costs, drawing upon existing arbitral jurisprudence and related caselaw. The analysis highlights the lack of explicit guidance in most institutional rules and the implications of this uncertainty for tribunals and parties.o:p/o:p

Journal of International ArbitrationVol. 42(Issue 3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.