Landmark Judgement by the Iranian Supreme Court; A Fresh Interpretation of Article 139 of Iran Constitution

This article analyses the Supreme Court of Iran’s landmark decision on Article 139 of the Iranian Constitution, issued on May 27, 2024. The ruling clarified the application of constitutional requirements for arbitration involving public and state-owned assets, resolving long-standing ambiguities about the timing and scope of governmental approvals. By distinguishing between the inclusion of arbitration clauses at contract formation and the referral of disputes to arbitration, the Court upheld the validity of a significant arbitration award and aligned Iran’s arbitration practices with international norms. This decision removes procedural barriers, fosters a more arbitration-friendly environment, and has far-reaching implications for privatization, foreign investment, and legislative reform. The article explores the case background, the Court’s rationale, and the broader legal and economic implications, offering a comprehensive analysis of the judgment’s impact on Iran’s arbitration landscape.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ASA Bulletin
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/asab2025045
Primary Topic
Turkey's Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landmark Judgement by the Iranian Supreme Court; A Fresh Interpretation of Article 139 of Iran Constitution

Nima Nasrollahi Shahri, Leyla Ebrahimi
ASA Bulletin
Turkey's Politics and Society
article

Landmark Judgement by the Iranian Supreme Court; A Fresh Interpretation of Article 139 of Iran Constitution

Nima Nasrollahi Shahri, Leyla Ebrahimi
article en

Abstract

This article analyses the Supreme Court of Iran’s landmark decision on Article 139 of the Iranian Constitution, issued on May 27, 2024. The ruling clarified the application of constitutional requirements for arbitration involving public and state-owned assets, resolving long-standing ambiguities about the timing and scope of governmental approvals. By distinguishing between the inclusion of arbitration clauses at contract formation and the referral of disputes to arbitration, the Court upheld the validity of a significant arbitration award and aligned Iran’s arbitration practices with international norms. This decision removes procedural barriers, fosters a more arbitration-friendly environment, and has far-reaching implications for privatization, foreign investment, and legislative reform. The article explores the case background, the Court’s rationale, and the broader legal and economic implications, offering a comprehensive analysis of the judgment’s impact on Iran’s arbitration landscape.

ASA BulletinVol. 43(Issue 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Turkey's Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.