Using higher cut-off values to diagnose acute myocardial infarction in patients with elevated hs-cTnT

It is often challenging to diagnose acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) before a significant rise and/or fall of hs-cTnT can be observed. This study aimed to find an optimal cut-off to rule in AMI. A total of 76411 patients with elevated hs-cTnT were included. The predictive cut-off values for diagnosing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Among the patients, 50466 (66.0%) had non-cardiac diseases, 25945 (34.0%) had cardiac diseases, and 15502 (20.3%) had AMI, including 816 (1.1%) with STEMI and 14686 (19.2%) with NSTEMI. The median hs-cTnT level was 3788.0 ng/L in STEMI patients and 67.2 ng/L in NSTEMI patients. The optimal cut-off for diagnosing STEMI was 251.9 ng/L, with a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 86.5%, and an AUC of 0.942; the optimal cut-off for diagnosing NSTEMI was 130.5 ng/L, with a sensitivity of 40.9%, specificity of 83.8%, and an AUC of 0.638. In patients with elevated hs-cTnT, optimizing the cut-off values for diagnosing STEMI and NSTEMI to 251.9 ng/L and 130.5 ng/L, respectively, demonstrated high accuracy in a large cohort of Chinese patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7555/jbr.38.20240364
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using higher cut-off values to diagnose acute myocardial infarction in patients with elevated hs-cTnT

Chunjian Li, Lei Xu, Chunyue Tan, Hui Zhou et al.
1 citations
Journal of Biomedical Research
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
1.39
article

Using higher cut-off values to diagnose acute myocardial infarction in patients with elevated hs-cTnT

Chunjian Li, Lei Xu, Chunyue Tan, Hui Zhou, Hui Yong, Fang Wang, Qin Wang, Jiani Xu, Zhenyu Lin, Yan Liu, Bo Chen, Tao Li, Tian Wu, Liu K, Xiaoxuan Gong, Ruxing Wang, Jing Shan, Zhiwen Tao, Yuan Liang, Jiaqi Chai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is often challenging to diagnose acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) before a significant rise and/or fall of hs-cTnT can be observed. This study aimed to find an optimal cut-off to rule in AMI. A total of 76411 patients with elevated hs-cTnT were included. The predictive cut-off values for diagnosing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Among the patients, 50466 (66.0%) had non-cardiac diseases, 25945 (34.0%) had cardiac diseases, and 15502 (20.3%) had AMI, including 816 (1.1%) with STEMI and 14686 (19.2%) with NSTEMI. The median hs-cTnT level was 3788.0 ng/L in STEMI patients and 67.2 ng/L in NSTEMI patients. The optimal cut-off for diagnosing STEMI was 251.9 ng/L, with a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 86.5%, and an AUC of 0.942; the optimal cut-off for diagnosing NSTEMI was 130.5 ng/L, with a sensitivity of 40.9%, specificity of 83.8%, and an AUC of 0.638. In patients with elevated hs-cTnT, optimizing the cut-off values for diagnosing STEMI and NSTEMI to 251.9 ng/L and 130.5 ng/L, respectively, demonstrated high accuracy in a large cohort of Chinese patients.

Journal of Biomedical ResearchVol. 39(6)
Nanjing Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Government of Jiangsu Province, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.