Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (<scp>GDBARP</scp>): Recommendations From Anatomical Journal Editors

Most discussions about discrimination and bias in anatomical research papers have been limited to terminology relating to race/ethnicity and gender/sex. However, as editors of anatomical journals, the authors of this article have frequently observed broader instances of potential discrimination and bias within anatomical research. These often stem from differences among authors' backgrounds, traditions, cultures, religions, provenance/origins, and workplace affiliations. In view of the limited discourse on this topic, we seek in this article to establish a consensus among editors of anatomical journals and to propose new Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP). We have identified multiple factors that can contribute to discrimination and bias, underscoring the need for greater awareness and proactive measures. It is imperative in anatomical research to respect authors, reviewers, and editors regardless of their background, culture, traditions, sex, ethnicity, language, religion, or ethical perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Anatomy
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24293
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP): Recommendations From Anatomical Journal Editors

Philip J. Adds, Fabrice Duparc, Nihal Apaydın, Sén Takeda et al.
3 citations
Clinical Anatomy
Diversity and Career in Medicine
11.60
article

Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP): Recommendations From Anatomical Journal Editors

Philip J. Adds, Fabrice Duparc, Nihal Apaydın, Sén Takeda, Joe Iwanaga, R. Shane Tubbs, Doménico Ribatti, Janusz Moryś, Jerzy Walocha, Kumar Satish Ravi, Marios Loukas, Friedrich Paulsen, Hee‐Jin Kim, Mariano del Sol, Vishram Singh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Most discussions about discrimination and bias in anatomical research papers have been limited to terminology relating to race/ethnicity and gender/sex. However, as editors of anatomical journals, the authors of this article have frequently observed broader instances of potential discrimination and bias within anatomical research. These often stem from differences among authors' backgrounds, traditions, cultures, religions, provenance/origins, and workplace affiliations. In view of the limited discourse on this topic, we seek in this article to establish a consensus among editors of anatomical journals and to propose new Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP). We have identified multiple factors that can contribute to discrimination and bias, underscoring the need for greater awareness and proactive measures. It is imperative in anatomical research to respect authors, reviewers, and editors regardless of their background, culture, traditions, sex, ethnicity, language, religion, or ethical perspectives.

Clinical AnatomyVol. 38(5)
Kurume University (JP), Tulane University (US), Universidad de La Frontera (CL), Jagiellonian University (PL), Mayo Clinic (US), Ochsner Health System (US), St. George's University (GD), Ankara University (TR), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), St George's, University of London (GB), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Yonsei University (KR), NIMS University (IN), Yonsei University College of Dentistry, University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Université de Rouen Normandie (FR), Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN), Pomeranian Medical University (PL), Teikyo University (JP)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
11.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.