Can Work Be Meaningful Under Algorithmic Management? A MacIntyrean Perspective

Algorithmic management is deeply changing the way work is performed and the interaction between managers and workers in organizations. It also heavily affects the conditions for meaningful work highlighted by existing literature. Therefore, organizations need an appropriate framework to enable meaningful work when adopting algorithmic management systems. This article presents a normative study of the conditions for work to be meaningful in this new scenario. To fulfil this purpose, it adopts a MacIntyrean approach, according to which work is meaningful when it embodies practice-like characteristics. The article identifies the main threats of algorithmic management and characterizes the normative conditions organizations should meet to enable meaningful work. In addition, the article explores the strategies of resistance that workers use to live up to the standards of meaningful work when organizations are not capable or willing to provide those conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics Quarterly
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2025.5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Work Be Meaningful Under Algorithmic Management? A MacIntyrean Perspective

Pablo García Ruiz, Marta Rocchi
3 citations
Business Ethics Quarterly
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
12.60
article

Can Work Be Meaningful Under Algorithmic Management? A MacIntyrean Perspective

Pablo García Ruiz, Marta Rocchi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Algorithmic management is deeply changing the way work is performed and the interaction between managers and workers in organizations. It also heavily affects the conditions for meaningful work highlighted by existing literature. Therefore, organizations need an appropriate framework to enable meaningful work when adopting algorithmic management systems. This article presents a normative study of the conditions for work to be meaningful in this new scenario. To fulfil this purpose, it adopts a MacIntyrean approach, according to which work is meaningful when it embodies practice-like characteristics. The article identifies the main threats of algorithmic management and characterizes the normative conditions organizations should meet to enable meaningful work. In addition, the article explores the strategies of resistance that workers use to live up to the standards of meaningful work when organizations are not capable or willing to provide those conditions.

Business Ethics QuarterlyVol. 36(1)
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Dublin City University (IE)
University of Oxford, Universidad de Navarra
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Work Be Meaningful Under Algorithmic Management? A MacIntyrean Perspective — Pablo García Ruiz, Marta Rocchi · Business Ethics Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS