Drug Utilization and Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions Assessment Among Discharged Pediatric Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

<b>Background and Aims:</b> Drug utilization and appropriateness assessment among pediatrics is crucial and relies on relevant evidence generation. The study aimed to analyze drug utilization and prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) and determine the risk factors for PIP among discharged pediatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. <b>Methods:</b> The cross-sectional study included discharged pediatric (aged < 18 years) prescriptions received between March and May 2023. Drug utilization was assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) Prescribing Indicators. Appropriateness was evaluated using the prescription intervention categories (implicit tool) and 67-item Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs in Pediatrics List (KIDs List; explicit tool). Categorical and continuous data were analyzed descriptively. Risk factors of PIP were determined by logistic regression analysis. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 1952 prescriptions (mean age 4.61 ± 4.72 years) containing 3304 drugs and 149 drug types were analyzed. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.69. The use of generic names and drugs from the Malaysian National Essential Medicines List were 2061 (62.38%) and 2985 (90.35%), respectively. The number of antibiotics and injectables per prescription were 1338 (68.55%) and 1(0.05%), respectively. The prevalence of PIP was 8.15% (n = 159). Sixty-one (3.13%) prescriptions were intervened for inappropriate regimen, mainly involving inappropriate dose (n = 47, 2.41%), and inappropriate frequency (n = 15, 0.77%). Ten drugs (14.93%) from KIDs List were prescribed in 80 prescriptions (4.09%), primarily involving tramadol (n = 40, 2.05%). Number of drugs prescribed (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.63, 95% CI (1.40, 1.89), <i>P</i> < .001), and ages 28 days to 23 months (aOR = 0.15, 95% CI (0.05, 0.49), <i>P</i> = .001), and 2 to 11 years (aOR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.07, 0.71), <i>P</i> = .011) were identified as PIP risk factors. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study found inconsistencies with WHO recommendations for essential drugs, antibiotics, and generic names. Although PIP prevalence was low, the number of drugs prescribed and age categories were key risk factors, emphasizing the need for structured drug reconciliation and a country-specific safe prescribing tool to minimize PIP in pediatric patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hospital Pharmacy
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251337624
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drug Utilization and Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions Assessment Among Discharged Pediatric Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Anis Suzanna Nor Azmi, Shamala Balan, Elfatih Idris, Safi Salim et al.
1 citations
Hospital Pharmacy
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
3.49
article

Drug Utilization and Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions Assessment Among Discharged Pediatric Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Anis Suzanna Nor Azmi, Shamala Balan, Elfatih Idris, Safi Salim, Meeradevi Maratha Muthu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background and Aims:</b> Drug utilization and appropriateness assessment among pediatrics is crucial and relies on relevant evidence generation. The study aimed to analyze drug utilization and prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) and determine the risk factors for PIP among discharged pediatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. <b>Methods:</b> The cross-sectional study included discharged pediatric (aged < 18 years) prescriptions received between March and May 2023. Drug utilization was assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) Prescribing Indicators. Appropriateness was evaluated using the prescription intervention categories (implicit tool) and 67-item Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs in Pediatrics List (KIDs List; explicit tool). Categorical and continuous data were analyzed descriptively. Risk factors of PIP were determined by logistic regression analysis. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 1952 prescriptions (mean age 4.61 ± 4.72 years) containing 3304 drugs and 149 drug types were analyzed. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.69. The use of generic names and drugs from the Malaysian National Essential Medicines List were 2061 (62.38%) and 2985 (90.35%), respectively. The number of antibiotics and injectables per prescription were 1338 (68.55%) and 1(0.05%), respectively. The prevalence of PIP was 8.15% (n = 159). Sixty-one (3.13%) prescriptions were intervened for inappropriate regimen, mainly involving inappropriate dose (n = 47, 2.41%), and inappropriate frequency (n = 15, 0.77%). Ten drugs (14.93%) from KIDs List were prescribed in 80 prescriptions (4.09%), primarily involving tramadol (n = 40, 2.05%). Number of drugs prescribed (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.63, 95% CI (1.40, 1.89), <i>P</i> < .001), and ages 28 days to 23 months (aOR = 0.15, 95% CI (0.05, 0.49), <i>P</i> = .001), and 2 to 11 years (aOR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.07, 0.71), <i>P</i> = .011) were identified as PIP risk factors. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study found inconsistencies with WHO recommendations for essential drugs, antibiotics, and generic names. Although PIP prevalence was low, the number of drugs prescribed and age categories were key risk factors, emphasizing the need for structured drug reconciliation and a country-specific safe prescribing tool to minimize PIP in pediatric patients.

Hospital PharmacyVol. 60(5)
Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital (MY)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.