Legislative networks as gatekeepers of dissensus in Armenia, Georgia and Moldova

Abstract The article identifies four strategies that political actors use to constrain the space for dissensus on liberal democracy in hybrid regimes during legislative drafting. The composition of the legislative commissions in charge of drafting reforms reveals the strategy deployed by powerful actors to shape the political reforms in accordance with their preferences, while undermining democratic accountability mechanisms. The article illustrates the adaptation of these strategies of control of dissensus on liberal democracy depending on the goals of the actors involved and the different political systems in Armenia, Georgia and Moldova.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Political Science
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-025-00541-9
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legislative networks as gatekeepers of dissensus in Armenia, Georgia and Moldova

Marta Matrakova
1 links
European Political Science
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Legislative networks as gatekeepers of dissensus in Armenia, Georgia and Moldova

Marta Matrakova
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article identifies four strategies that political actors use to constrain the space for dissensus on liberal democracy in hybrid regimes during legislative drafting. The composition of the legislative commissions in charge of drafting reforms reveals the strategy deployed by powerful actors to shape the political reforms in accordance with their preferences, while undermining democratic accountability mechanisms. The article illustrates the adaptation of these strategies of control of dissensus on liberal democracy depending on the goals of the actors involved and the different political systems in Armenia, Georgia and Moldova.

European Political ScienceVol. 24(3)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.