Who Gets to End the World? Trans, Abortion, and the Possibility of Natality

In this article the violence surrounding reproductive issues, by example of forced sterilisation of trans people and abortion access, is used to ask fundamental questions about the role of institutions. New right-wing laws that aim to block access to abortion and trans healthcare are reviewed to highlight the link between gender and the state. It is argued that the weaponisation of law is used to individualise people and hinder access to care, disrupt choice, and minimise agency. Instead of presenting liberalism as an alternative to protect an individualised choice-model that safeguards people’s needs, the case is made that the idea of autonomy enables violence by institutions to more marginalised members of democracies. By drawing on a wide range of insights, the argument is made that institutional functioning is the source of significant violence to those not empowered by institutions and interrupts people giving direction to their lives. Instead of institutional power, Hannah Arendt’s concept of natality is understood as a condition of life, indicating how social movements can birth new collective directions as a form of abolition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251337149
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
38.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Gets to End the World? Trans, Abortion, and the Possibility of Natality

Mijke van der Drift
1 citations
Alternatives Global Local Political
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
38.00
article

Who Gets to End the World? Trans, Abortion, and the Possibility of Natality

Mijke van der Drift
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article the violence surrounding reproductive issues, by example of forced sterilisation of trans people and abortion access, is used to ask fundamental questions about the role of institutions. New right-wing laws that aim to block access to abortion and trans healthcare are reviewed to highlight the link between gender and the state. It is argued that the weaponisation of law is used to individualise people and hinder access to care, disrupt choice, and minimise agency. Instead of presenting liberalism as an alternative to protect an individualised choice-model that safeguards people’s needs, the case is made that the idea of autonomy enables violence by institutions to more marginalised members of democracies. By drawing on a wide range of insights, the argument is made that institutional functioning is the source of significant violence to those not empowered by institutions and interrupts people giving direction to their lives. Instead of institutional power, Hannah Arendt’s concept of natality is understood as a condition of life, indicating how social movements can birth new collective directions as a form of abolition.

Alternatives Global Local PoliticalVol. 51(1)
Royal College of Art (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
38.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.