From intelligence to autopoiesis: rethinking artificial intelligence through systems theory

The rapid advancements in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) have reinvigorated profound debates on the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and communication. Large language models (LLMs), in particular, are at the center of these discussions, as they generate complex linguistic patterns and challenge the traditional distinction between machine computation and human understanding. While LLMs are often seen as highly advanced statistical systems that generate text based on probabilistic patterns, both laypeople and experts tend to attribute human-like qualities to them.This article analyzes AI, particularly LLMs, from a systems-theoretical perspective and examines the extent to which these models can be understood as autopoietic, operationally closed systems. Building on Luhmann's system theory, it is argued that classical Turing machines are not sense-making systems, as they lack both self-reference in the sense of re-entry and the ability to make contingent selections from possibilities. In contrast, artificial neural networks (ANNs) exhibit a novel, loosely coupled interaction with social systems, as they can extract patterns from societal communication. This form of coupling differentiates them from classical software and positions them as hybrid systems that, while lacking their own mental states, are nonetheless deeply embedded in the structures of societal meaning production. The paper argues that LLMs should neither be regarded as purely technical tools nor as genuine cognitive entities. Instead, it proposes understanding their functioning as a new form of artificial meaning production—not as independent thinking, but as a recursive reflection of socially shaped linguistic patterns. This perspective not only opens new insights into the relationship between humans and machines but also calls for a critical reflection on how AI technologies are transforming our understanding of communication and cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1585321
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From intelligence to autopoiesis: rethinking artificial intelligence through systems theory

Benedikt Zönnchen, Gudrun Socher, Mariya Dzhimova
4 citations
Frontiers in Communication
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
6.02
article

From intelligence to autopoiesis: rethinking artificial intelligence through systems theory

Benedikt Zönnchen, Gudrun Socher, Mariya Dzhimova
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancements in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) have reinvigorated profound debates on the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and communication. Large language models (LLMs), in particular, are at the center of these discussions, as they generate complex linguistic patterns and challenge the traditional distinction between machine computation and human understanding. While LLMs are often seen as highly advanced statistical systems that generate text based on probabilistic patterns, both laypeople and experts tend to attribute human-like qualities to them.This article analyzes AI, particularly LLMs, from a systems-theoretical perspective and examines the extent to which these models can be understood as autopoietic, operationally closed systems. Building on Luhmann's system theory, it is argued that classical Turing machines are not sense-making systems, as they lack both self-reference in the sense of re-entry and the ability to make contingent selections from possibilities. In contrast, artificial neural networks (ANNs) exhibit a novel, loosely coupled interaction with social systems, as they can extract patterns from societal communication. This form of coupling differentiates them from classical software and positions them as hybrid systems that, while lacking their own mental states, are nonetheless deeply embedded in the structures of societal meaning production. The paper argues that LLMs should neither be regarded as purely technical tools nor as genuine cognitive entities. Instead, it proposes understanding their functioning as a new form of artificial meaning production—not as independent thinking, but as a recursive reflection of socially shaped linguistic patterns. This perspective not only opens new insights into the relationship between humans and machines but also calls for a critical reflection on how AI technologies are transforming our understanding of communication and cognition.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 10
Munich University of Applied Sciences (DE), Hochschule für Musik und Theater München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.