Root-shoot allometry and drought response of dominant and co-dominant European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in monospecific versus mixed-species stands in Bavaria, Germany

Abstract Climate change and associated drought stress significantly impact tree root systems and canopies, essential for water and nutrient provision. We examined the root-shoot allometry of dominant European beech ( Fagus sylvatica [L.]) and Norway spruce ( Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in monospecific and mixed-species stands across five triplets along a climatic and geological gradient from North to South Bavaria, focusing on their drought responses. We used Lloret indices of resistance, resilience, and recovery to assess the effects of the exceptionally hot drought year of 2003 on root and shoot growth. Data were categorized by stand type: beech pure (BP), beech mixed (BM), spruce pure (SP), and spruce mixed (SM). Results showed that the allometric factor decreased in the order SP (− 2.986) > SM (− 3.960) > BP (− 7.434) > BM (− 8.628), and the allometric exponent in the order BM (3.159) > BP (2.795) > SM (1.914) > SP (1.657), with significant differences between species. For European beech, the allometric factor was significantly affected by stand density and site index, and the allometric exponent by tree species, mixed stand type, and site index. European beech exhibited higher resistance and resilience in shoot growth compared to Norway spruce, with no significant influence from stand type. Root growth patterns were similar, with European beech being more resilient and resistant than Norway spruce, although to a lesser extent. European beech also recovered faster than Norway spruce, with significant differences between their respective monospecific stands. We concluded that root growth for both species was enhanced compared to shoot growth, improving anchoring and the supply of water and nutrients to the aboveground tree organs. European beech experienced less drought stress than Norway spruce, attributed to differences in their physiology and root system characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Forest Research
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-025-01786-1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Root-shoot allometry and drought response of dominant and co-dominant European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in monospecific versus mixed-species stands in Bavaria, Germany

Thomas Rötzer, Matthias Ulbricht, Hans Pretzsch, Enno Uhl et al.
4 citations
European Journal of Forest Research
Forest ecology and management
9.25
article

Root-shoot allometry and drought response of dominant and co-dominant European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in monospecific versus mixed-species stands in Bavaria, Germany

Thomas Rötzer, Matthias Ulbricht, Hans Pretzsch, Enno Uhl, Peter Biber
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Climate change and associated drought stress significantly impact tree root systems and canopies, essential for water and nutrient provision. We examined the root-shoot allometry of dominant European beech ( Fagus sylvatica [L.]) and Norway spruce ( Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in monospecific and mixed-species stands across five triplets along a climatic and geological gradient from North to South Bavaria, focusing on their drought responses. We used Lloret indices of resistance, resilience, and recovery to assess the effects of the exceptionally hot drought year of 2003 on root and shoot growth. Data were categorized by stand type: beech pure (BP), beech mixed (BM), spruce pure (SP), and spruce mixed (SM). Results showed that the allometric factor decreased in the order SP (− 2.986) > SM (− 3.960) > BP (− 7.434) > BM (− 8.628), and the allometric exponent in the order BM (3.159) > BP (2.795) > SM (1.914) > SP (1.657), with significant differences between species. For European beech, the allometric factor was significantly affected by stand density and site index, and the allometric exponent by tree species, mixed stand type, and site index. European beech exhibited higher resistance and resilience in shoot growth compared to Norway spruce, with no significant influence from stand type. Root growth patterns were similar, with European beech being more resilient and resistant than Norway spruce, although to a lesser extent. European beech also recovered faster than Norway spruce, with significant differences between their respective monospecific stands. We concluded that root growth for both species was enhanced compared to shoot growth, improving anchoring and the supply of water and nutrients to the aboveground tree organs. European beech experienced less drought stress than Norway spruce, attributed to differences in their physiology and root system characteristics.

European Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 144(5)
Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (DE), Institute of Technology Carlow (IE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universität München, Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Forest ecology and management
9.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.