Are you s(ec)ure? assessing the sensitivity of land tenure security estimates to survey design choices

• Few countries have data on land tenure security despite its SDG relevance. • Individual-level data is crucial for accurate monitoring of land rights. • Men report higher land tenure security than women. • Respondent approach and level of observation affect estimates of land rights. • Survey design also influences the observed gender gap. Land tenure security is critically linked to several dimensions of development, including increased access to credit, investment, productivity, food security, and intra-household bargaining power, among others. Inequities across and within households, including productivity differentials, can be traced to and explained by difference in access to land. Despite being featured in two SDG indicators, very few countries have adequate data to understand and monitor land tenure security. Remedying that demands a shift from household-level data collection to more and better data on individual-level land rights. This paper leverages a unique methodological experiment in Armenia to rigorously examine the implications of respondent strategy and data collection level on land tenure data quality in the context of SDG monitoring. Findings from the randomization of households across treatment arms reveal significant differences in the estimation of certain land tenure components, especially when using proxy respondents at the parcel level. Gender disparities in land rights are prevalent, with men consistently reporting higher land tenure security than women across all measurement methods, with the point estimates of the implied gender gap varying with survey design choice. Heterogeneity and further analyses also shed light on a set of trade-offs deriving from factors such as areas of residence and gender of the reporting individual, financial constraints, survey structure, and respondent fatigue. The study contributes to the understanding of land tenure measurement and aligns with broader initiatives aimed at efficiently collecting comparable individual-level data at scale while informing policy decisions and SDG reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102888
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are you s(ec)ure? assessing the sensitivity of land tenure security estimates to survey design choices

Alberto Zezza, Giuseppe Maggio, Sydney Gourlay, Anahit Safyan
Food Policy
Land Rights and Reforms
article

Are you s(ec)ure? assessing the sensitivity of land tenure security estimates to survey design choices

Alberto Zezza, Giuseppe Maggio, Sydney Gourlay, Anahit Safyan
article en

Abstract

• Few countries have data on land tenure security despite its SDG relevance. • Individual-level data is crucial for accurate monitoring of land rights. • Men report higher land tenure security than women. • Respondent approach and level of observation affect estimates of land rights. • Survey design also influences the observed gender gap. Land tenure security is critically linked to several dimensions of development, including increased access to credit, investment, productivity, food security, and intra-household bargaining power, among others. Inequities across and within households, including productivity differentials, can be traced to and explained by difference in access to land. Despite being featured in two SDG indicators, very few countries have adequate data to understand and monitor land tenure security. Remedying that demands a shift from household-level data collection to more and better data on individual-level land rights. This paper leverages a unique methodological experiment in Armenia to rigorously examine the implications of respondent strategy and data collection level on land tenure data quality in the context of SDG monitoring. Findings from the randomization of households across treatment arms reveal significant differences in the estimation of certain land tenure components, especially when using proxy respondents at the parcel level. Gender disparities in land rights are prevalent, with men consistently reporting higher land tenure security than women across all measurement methods, with the point estimates of the implied gender gap varying with survey design choice. Heterogeneity and further analyses also shed light on a set of trade-offs deriving from factors such as areas of residence and gender of the reporting individual, financial constraints, survey structure, and respondent fatigue. The study contributes to the understanding of land tenure measurement and aligns with broader initiatives aimed at efficiently collecting comparable individual-level data at scale while informing policy decisions and SDG reporting.

Food PolicyVol. 134
Bank of Italy (IT), World Bank (US), National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia (AM), University of Palermo (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.