Perceived motivators and barriers to research engagement for psychologists in an Australian public healthcare service: insights from the research capacity and culture survey

Objective Building capacity to embed research into care is central to improving healthcare delivery. Psychologists are well equipped and uniquely positioned to conduct clinical research given the significant research component of clinical training. Despite this, relatively little is known about how psychologists working in Australian public health rate their own skills and capacity for research at a team and organisational level. Methods Ninety-two psychologists working at Monash Health, Victoria, Australia completed the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool and answered questions relating to perceived barriers and motivators to research engagement in their clinical roles. Results While psychologists rated their own individual capacity to engage in research as high, they perceived the research skills and success of their clinical teams and the organisation as low to moderate. Inductive content analyses revealed constraints of clinical role, lack of system/infrastructure, and lack of organisational/team visibility as barriers to research engagement, whereas drive for clinical excellence, internal motivation and a positive team culture were highlighted as motivators. Conclusions We discuss the potential untapped resource of psychologists in Australian public health who are interested and skilled to engage in research but perceive challenges of a lack of research capacity and culture within their team and organisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Health Review
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ah25015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived motivators and barriers to research engagement for psychologists in an Australian public healthcare service: insights from the research capacity and culture survey

Alexandra Ure, Claire Lee, Christine Miller
1 citations
Australian Health Review
Health Sciences Research and Education
2.82
article

Perceived motivators and barriers to research engagement for psychologists in an Australian public healthcare service: insights from the research capacity and culture survey

Alexandra Ure, Claire Lee, Christine Miller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective Building capacity to embed research into care is central to improving healthcare delivery. Psychologists are well equipped and uniquely positioned to conduct clinical research given the significant research component of clinical training. Despite this, relatively little is known about how psychologists working in Australian public health rate their own skills and capacity for research at a team and organisational level. Methods Ninety-two psychologists working at Monash Health, Victoria, Australia completed the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool and answered questions relating to perceived barriers and motivators to research engagement in their clinical roles. Results While psychologists rated their own individual capacity to engage in research as high, they perceived the research skills and success of their clinical teams and the organisation as low to moderate. Inductive content analyses revealed constraints of clinical role, lack of system/infrastructure, and lack of organisational/team visibility as barriers to research engagement, whereas drive for clinical excellence, internal motivation and a positive team culture were highlighted as motivators. Conclusions We discuss the potential untapped resource of psychologists in Australian public health who are interested and skilled to engage in research but perceive challenges of a lack of research capacity and culture within their team and organisation.

Australian Health ReviewVol. 49(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health Sciences Research and Education
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.