Strengths and Limitations of Existing STAMP Tools for Analyzing System of Systems Risks

The System Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) considers safety as a dynamic problem by focusing on interactions among system components rather than on component failure. However, analyzing complex system risks with STAMP can be challenging due to manual processes. Therefore, software tools supporting STAMP analysis have been developed. An evaluation of five tools (ASTAH, STPA, Capella, XSTAMPP, STPA Master Lite, and Visio Pro) was conducted, focusing on systems of systems (SoS) risk analysis. While all tools demonstrated compliance with the STAMP risk analysis procedure, with some tools offering additional features, a shortcoming in scalability limits the support for risk analysis of SoS. This makes risk analysis with the available STAMP tools challenging for SoS. Recommended enhancements include mechanisms to address SoS characteristics, scalability, collaboration, and improved usability. The study contributes to research on SoS risk analysis and provides direction for advancement in risk analysis tool support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59297/c0n7rh46
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengths and Limitations of Existing STAMP Tools for Analyzing System of Systems Risks

Pontus Svenson, Jakob Axelsson, Anna Johansson, Marjorie Nawila Pettersson
1 citations
Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
Risk and Safety Analysis
8.92
article

Strengths and Limitations of Existing STAMP Tools for Analyzing System of Systems Risks

Pontus Svenson, Jakob Axelsson, Anna Johansson, Marjorie Nawila Pettersson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The System Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) considers safety as a dynamic problem by focusing on interactions among system components rather than on component failure. However, analyzing complex system risks with STAMP can be challenging due to manual processes. Therefore, software tools supporting STAMP analysis have been developed. An evaluation of five tools (ASTAH, STPA, Capella, XSTAMPP, STPA Master Lite, and Visio Pro) was conducted, focusing on systems of systems (SoS) risk analysis. While all tools demonstrated compliance with the STAMP risk analysis procedure, with some tools offering additional features, a shortcoming in scalability limits the support for risk analysis of SoS. This makes risk analysis with the available STAMP tools challenging for SoS. Recommended enhancements include mechanisms to address SoS characteristics, scalability, collaboration, and improved usability. The study contributes to research on SoS risk analysis and provides direction for advancement in risk analysis tool support.

Proceedings of the ... International ISCRAM Conference
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE), Mälardalen University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Risk and Safety Analysis
8.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.