Navigating the Boundaries of Digital Platform Content Regulation in New Zealand

This article examines the complexities of implementing online content regulation in a small jurisdiction such as New Zealand. Three attempts at hate speech and online content regulation have faltered, in part due to the difficulty of crafting precise legal definitions and different possible conceptions of harm. The ‘safer online services and media platforms’ policy is the most recent. Given New Zealand’s limited market size and the global reach of online platforms, enforcing local content standards is both impractical and potentially ineffective. Most content originates offshore, beyond the scope of domestic legislation, and technological solutions to tailor content to individual user groups are costly and easily circumvented. Existing domestic laws and voluntary industry codes combined with the spillover effects of regulations in larger jurisdictions and international multi-stakeholder efforts likely offer more effective solutions then local legislation. Hence, fostering international cooperation, leveraging global standards and encouraging voluntary compliance should be encouraged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Quarterly
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v21i2.9818
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Boundaries of Digital Platform Content Regulation in New Zealand

Bronwyn Howell, Petrus H. Potgieter
2 links
Policy Quarterly
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Navigating the Boundaries of Digital Platform Content Regulation in New Zealand

Bronwyn Howell, Petrus H. Potgieter
article en

Abstract

This article examines the complexities of implementing online content regulation in a small jurisdiction such as New Zealand. Three attempts at hate speech and online content regulation have faltered, in part due to the difficulty of crafting precise legal definitions and different possible conceptions of harm. The ‘safer online services and media platforms’ policy is the most recent. Given New Zealand’s limited market size and the global reach of online platforms, enforcing local content standards is both impractical and potentially ineffective. Most content originates offshore, beyond the scope of domestic legislation, and technological solutions to tailor content to individual user groups are costly and easily circumvented. Existing domestic laws and voluntary industry codes combined with the spillover effects of regulations in larger jurisdictions and international multi-stakeholder efforts likely offer more effective solutions then local legislation. Hence, fostering international cooperation, leveraging global standards and encouraging voluntary compliance should be encouraged.

Policy QuarterlyVol. 21(2)
University of South Africa (ZA), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Decision Sciences (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating the Boundaries of Digital Platform Content Regulation in New Zealand — Bronwyn Howell, Petrus H. Potgieter · Policy Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS