A new aphid IPM strategy based on the use of endophytic entomopathogenic ascomycetes that reduces treatment risks to the generalist predator Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens)

The melon aphid Aphis gossypii is one of the most damaging and economically important crop pests. Entomopathogenic ascomycete (EA) have shown great potential in managing this pest, with several mycoinsecticides available on the market. Recent studies also highlight the systemic efficacy of EA endophytic strains, targeting aphids through the plant and impacting their survival and reproduction. EA endophytic application prevents direct contact between EA and beneficial insects which increases their safety. Indeed, EA endophyte compatibility with other biological control agents, such as entomophagous predators, has been demonstrated under laboratory conditions. However, these results need to be validated using different application methods and under greenhouse conditions. In this study, we evaluated the biocontrol potential of two endophytic EA strains against A. gossypii in melon crops under greenhouse conditions. Based on their known endophytic behavior, Metarhizium brunneum strain EAMa 01/58-Su was applied as a foliar spray while Beauveria bassiana strain EABb 01/33-Su was applied as a seed dressing. Furthermore, the compatibility of these EA applications with the predator Chrysoperla carnea was assessed. Two repetitions were made in a greenhouse in Córdoba (Spain), the first in summer and the second in autumn. It is noteworthy that, in summer, foliar spraying with M. brunneum resulted in 35.0 % aphid mortality and a 20.4 % reduction in total per capita nymph production (TCNP) on sprayed leaves. In contrast, leaves not sprayed with the fungal suspension but endophytically colonized caused 70.0 % aphid mortality and a 12.6 % reduction in TCNP, which demonstrates the systemic potential of this fungus. Compatibility between C. carnea and M. brunneum was also demonstrated; there was a significant increase in prey consumption on endophytically-colonized leaves compared with predation levels observed in control plants. Seed dressing with B. bassiana led to 55.0 % aphid mortality and a 19.2 % reduction in TCNP but had no significant effect on C. carnea predation. The same trends were observed in autumn, although colder temperatures reduced aphid mortality. Our results highlight the potential of fungus-predator biocontrol strategies within an aphid Integrated Pest Management program under greenhouse conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2025.108357
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new aphid IPM strategy based on the use of endophytic entomopathogenic ascomycetes that reduces treatment risks to the generalist predator Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens)

Enrique Quesada‐Moraga, María Cuenca-Medina, Natalia González-Mas, Óscar Martínez-Anguita et al.
4 citations
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
6.69
article

A new aphid IPM strategy based on the use of endophytic entomopathogenic ascomycetes that reduces treatment risks to the generalist predator Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens)

Enrique Quesada‐Moraga, María Cuenca-Medina, Natalia González-Mas, Óscar Martínez-Anguita, Andrés Sandoval-Lozano
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The melon aphid Aphis gossypii is one of the most damaging and economically important crop pests. Entomopathogenic ascomycete (EA) have shown great potential in managing this pest, with several mycoinsecticides available on the market. Recent studies also highlight the systemic efficacy of EA endophytic strains, targeting aphids through the plant and impacting their survival and reproduction. EA endophytic application prevents direct contact between EA and beneficial insects which increases their safety. Indeed, EA endophyte compatibility with other biological control agents, such as entomophagous predators, has been demonstrated under laboratory conditions. However, these results need to be validated using different application methods and under greenhouse conditions. In this study, we evaluated the biocontrol potential of two endophytic EA strains against A. gossypii in melon crops under greenhouse conditions. Based on their known endophytic behavior, Metarhizium brunneum strain EAMa 01/58-Su was applied as a foliar spray while Beauveria bassiana strain EABb 01/33-Su was applied as a seed dressing. Furthermore, the compatibility of these EA applications with the predator Chrysoperla carnea was assessed. Two repetitions were made in a greenhouse in Córdoba (Spain), the first in summer and the second in autumn. It is noteworthy that, in summer, foliar spraying with M. brunneum resulted in 35.0 % aphid mortality and a 20.4 % reduction in total per capita nymph production (TCNP) on sprayed leaves. In contrast, leaves not sprayed with the fungal suspension but endophytically colonized caused 70.0 % aphid mortality and a 12.6 % reduction in TCNP, which demonstrates the systemic potential of this fungus. Compatibility between C. carnea and M. brunneum was also demonstrated; there was a significant increase in prey consumption on endophytically-colonized leaves compared with predation levels observed in control plants. Seed dressing with B. bassiana led to 55.0 % aphid mortality and a 19.2 % reduction in TCNP but had no significant effect on C. carnea predation. The same trends were observed in autumn, although colder temperatures reduced aphid mortality. Our results highlight the potential of fungus-predator biocontrol strategies within an aphid Integrated Pest Management program under greenhouse conditions.

Journal of Invertebrate PathologyVol. 211
University of Córdoba (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.