Panel discussions on the global regulatory acceptance and harmonisation of non-animal NAMs

Two panel discussions on non-animal New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory safety assessments were held as webinars. These webinars were initiated and hosted by the scientific committee Pro Anima with contributions from international experts in the field. The panel discussions thoroughly explored the current landscape surrounding international regulatory acceptance and harmonisation of NAMs. The discussion focused on the regulatory challenges, stakeholder engagement, validation hurdles, and international efforts to facilitate a broader and more efficient adoption of NAMs in safety decision-making. The discussion also covered the role of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) in advancing NAMs and provided insights into successful case studies, challenges and opportunities, and ongoing initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NAM journal.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Panel discussions on the global regulatory acceptance and harmonisation of non-animal NAMs

Clive Roper, Nina Hobi, Surat Parvatam, Lilas Courtot et al.
1 citations
NAM journal.
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
0.86
article

Panel discussions on the global regulatory acceptance and harmonisation of non-animal NAMs

Clive Roper, Nina Hobi, Surat Parvatam, Lilas Courtot, Ellen Fritsche, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Robert Lee, Carl Westmoreland, Emeline Gougeon, Merel Riskes-Hoitinga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Two panel discussions on non-animal New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory safety assessments were held as webinars. These webinars were initiated and hosted by the scientific committee Pro Anima with contributions from international experts in the field. The panel discussions thoroughly explored the current landscape surrounding international regulatory acceptance and harmonisation of NAMs. The discussion focused on the regulatory challenges, stakeholder engagement, validation hurdles, and international efforts to facilitate a broader and more efficient adoption of NAMs in safety decision-making. The discussion also covered the role of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) in advancing NAMs and provided insights into successful case studies, challenges and opportunities, and ongoing initiatives.

NAM journal.Vol. 1
University of Bern (CH), National Center for Toxicological Research (US), Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Bedfordshire (GB), Fondation de Coopération Scientifique (FR), Institute for Experimental Psychophysiology (Germany) (DE), Swisscom (Switzerland) (CH), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Panel discussions on the global regulatory acceptance and harmonisation of non-animal NAMs — Clive Roper, Nina Hobi, et al. · NAM journal. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS