Transparency in Open Science: An Actionable Principle?

Abstract This review discusses the concept of transparency as a cornerstone for the open science (OS) paradigm and the open access movement. To this regard, the contribution presents a review of official positions of supra-national bodies regarding OS and transparent research ontologies and contrasts them with convergent elements in scholarly works assessing distinct aspects of openness and transparency in research systems. As seen in the literature, transparency defines most policy and declarative approaches for greater access and academic accountability, yet the concept is rarely defined or operatively characterised. Hence, the text discusses a framing of transparency to accompany and better understand its guiding role in the OS and open innovation systems and presents the example of open peer review as a paradigmatic case. Final remarks are presented in order to indicate potential avenues of research, as well as areas of scholarly incidence to expand and deepen the reach of transparency-oriented academic and scientific practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Information Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2025-0016
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparency in Open Science: An Actionable Principle?

Roberto Cruz Romero
Open Information Science
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Transparency in Open Science: An Actionable Principle?

Roberto Cruz Romero
article en

Abstract

Abstract This review discusses the concept of transparency as a cornerstone for the open science (OS) paradigm and the open access movement. To this regard, the contribution presents a review of official positions of supra-national bodies regarding OS and transparent research ontologies and contrasts them with convergent elements in scholarly works assessing distinct aspects of openness and transparency in research systems. As seen in the literature, transparency defines most policy and declarative approaches for greater access and academic accountability, yet the concept is rarely defined or operatively characterised. Hence, the text discusses a framing of transparency to accompany and better understand its guiding role in the OS and open innovation systems and presents the example of open peer review as a paradigmatic case. Final remarks are presented in order to indicate potential avenues of research, as well as areas of scholarly incidence to expand and deepen the reach of transparency-oriented academic and scientific practices.

Open Information ScienceVol. 9(1)
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.