Comparative Analysis of Linear Regression Models and XGBoost to Assess the Impact of ENSO on Rainfall in Ternate City in 2023

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well two prediction models—linear regression and XGBoost—perform in assessing how ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) affects rainfall in Ternate City in 2023. The Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) provided monthly rainfall data, while the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) in Australia provided ENSO index data. Performance indicators such Pearson correlation analysis, the coefficient of determination (R-squared), and mean squared error (MSE) were used in the evaluation. According to the findings, the two models perform differently when it comes to capturing the pattern of the link between rainfall and ENSO; XGBoost is more adaptable but has a tendency to overfit on small amounts of data, whereas linear regression obtains a better R-squared value.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computation Physics and Earth Science (JoCPES)
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63581/jocpes.v5i1.02
Primary Topic
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Linear Regression Models and XGBoost to Assess the Impact of ENSO on Rainfall in Ternate City in 2023

Anton Widodo, Muchamad Rizqy Nugraha, Firman Almaliky Gapri Amra
3 links
Journal of Computation Physics and Earth Science (JoCPES)
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
article

Comparative Analysis of Linear Regression Models and XGBoost to Assess the Impact of ENSO on Rainfall in Ternate City in 2023

Anton Widodo, Muchamad Rizqy Nugraha, Firman Almaliky Gapri Amra
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well two prediction models—linear regression and XGBoost—perform in assessing how ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) affects rainfall in Ternate City in 2023. The Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) provided monthly rainfall data, while the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) in Australia provided ENSO index data. Performance indicators such Pearson correlation analysis, the coefficient of determination (R-squared), and mean squared error (MSE) were used in the evaluation. According to the findings, the two models perform differently when it comes to capturing the pattern of the link between rainfall and ENSO; XGBoost is more adaptable but has a tendency to overfit on small amounts of data, whereas linear regression obtains a better R-squared value.

Journal of Computation Physics and Earth Science (JoCPES)Vol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.