DESCRIMINALIZAÇÃO DA MACONHA PARA USO PESSOAL: ANÁLISE SOBRE A DECISÃO DO STF NO RECURSO EXTRAORDINÁRIO (RE) 635659 E SEUS IMPACTOS NA ATUAÇÃO POLICIAL

This article aims to analyze the decision of the Supreme Federal Court regarding quantitative parameters that distinguish possession for personal use from the illicit trafficking of marijuana, according to Article 33 of Law No. 11,343/2006, highlighting the legal and social impacts, particularly in relation to police approaches and public safety. The study is based on understanding, in light of jurisprudence and current legislation, the reflections of this new interpretation, employing a descriptive methodology grounded in the analysis of judicial decisions and scientific literature. Furthermore, based on the establishment of objective criteria by the Supreme Federal Court concerning the amount of substance necessary to characterize trafficking, the article seeks to understand the legal limits of police approaches and adapt them to the new legal understanding, considering the constitutional principles of privacy, human dignity, and the implications of structural racism and penal selectivity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista fisio&terapia.
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ni10202505181501
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DESCRIMINALIZAÇÃO DA MACONHA PARA USO PESSOAL: ANÁLISE SOBRE A DECISÃO DO STF NO RECURSO EXTRAORDINÁRIO (RE) 635659 E SEUS IMPACTOS NA ATUAÇÃO POLICIAL

Miguel Ribeiro, Israel Gomes de Amorim Santos, Hellen Cristine Sousa Miranda
Revista fisio&terapia.
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

DESCRIMINALIZAÇÃO DA MACONHA PARA USO PESSOAL: ANÁLISE SOBRE A DECISÃO DO STF NO RECURSO EXTRAORDINÁRIO (RE) 635659 E SEUS IMPACTOS NA ATUAÇÃO POLICIAL

Miguel Ribeiro, Israel Gomes de Amorim Santos, Hellen Cristine Sousa Miranda
article en

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the decision of the Supreme Federal Court regarding quantitative parameters that distinguish possession for personal use from the illicit trafficking of marijuana, according to Article 33 of Law No. 11,343/2006, highlighting the legal and social impacts, particularly in relation to police approaches and public safety. The study is based on understanding, in light of jurisprudence and current legislation, the reflections of this new interpretation, employing a descriptive methodology grounded in the analysis of judicial decisions and scientific literature. Furthermore, based on the establishment of objective criteria by the Supreme Federal Court concerning the amount of substance necessary to characterize trafficking, the article seeks to understand the legal limits of police approaches and adapt them to the new legal understanding, considering the constitutional principles of privacy, human dignity, and the implications of structural racism and penal selectivity.

Revista fisio&terapia.Vol. 29(146)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.