Finite Mixed Extension of Dyadic Games and their Fair Solutions

Abstract A dyadic game being a result of binarization of the strategic behaviour may have either non-fair or impracticable equilibria if the game is not solved in pure strategies. Therefore, a novel approach is suggested for solving such dyadic games. The number of game rounds is the key parameter, which determines a respective finite mixed extension of the game. The finite mixed extension implies using only those non-pure mixed strategies whose nonzero probabilities are fractions with a definite denominator. The finiteness allows consistently realizing such probabilities, whereupon the respective players’ payoffs tend to those theoretically calculated. Compared to the classic equilibrium conception, the suggested approach is more efficient in fair solutions, where the fairness includes both the payoffs equalization and the payoffs sum maximization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Computer Systems
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2025-0006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite Mixed Extension of Dyadic Games and their Fair Solutions

Vadim Romanuke
1 citations
Applied Computer Systems
Game Theory and Applications
2.11
article

Finite Mixed Extension of Dyadic Games and their Fair Solutions

Vadim Romanuke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A dyadic game being a result of binarization of the strategic behaviour may have either non-fair or impracticable equilibria if the game is not solved in pure strategies. Therefore, a novel approach is suggested for solving such dyadic games. The number of game rounds is the key parameter, which determines a respective finite mixed extension of the game. The finite mixed extension implies using only those non-pure mixed strategies whose nonzero probabilities are fractions with a definite denominator. The finiteness allows consistently realizing such probabilities, whereupon the respective players’ payoffs tend to those theoretically calculated. Compared to the classic equilibrium conception, the suggested approach is more efficient in fair solutions, where the fairness includes both the payoffs equalization and the payoffs sum maximization.

Applied Computer SystemsVol. 30(1)
Polish Naval Academy (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Game Theory and Applications
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.