Geopolymer stabilization of expansive soils using zeolitic tuff: A sustainable alternative to cement-based stabilization

• Zeolitic Tuff-based geopolymers offer a low-carbon alternative to traditional cement. • Geopolymer treatment cuts free swell to 0.25%, improving volume stability. • MEPDG shows reduced rutting, fatigue cracking and improved structure in stabilized layers. • SEM confirms a dense matrix-forming, enhancing soil strength and stability The effectiveness of zeolitic tuff (ZT) based geopolymer stabilization as a sustainable alternative to conventional cement stabilization for expansive soils is investigated in this study. Mechanical and geotechnical properties of geopolymer stabilized soil are evaluated in terms of ZT content, sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide (NS:NH) ratio and curing time. Soil improvement was assessed by laboratory tests, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), plasticity, compaction, and free swell tests. The test results show that the geopolymer stabilization increases the UCS significantly, as the NS:NH=2:1 mixture attains the maximum UCS of about 5.0 MPa in 28 days of curing, representing a 40% increase over 12% cement-stabilized soil. Furthermore, geopolymer-stabilized soils show a higher swelling reduction with free swell percentages as low as 0.25%, a 42% improvement compared to cement. The environmental assessment shows a 19% lower CO₂ emission per MPa of strength for geopolymer stabilization compared to cement-based stabilization, making it an eco-friendly choice. Pavement performance analysis using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) indicates that geopolymer-stabilized subbase layers improve structural integrity while reducing overall pavement rutting and fatigue cracking. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) results validate the creation of a dense geopolymer matrix structure that enhances the strength and stability characteristics of soil materials. The study concludes that geopolymer stabilization using ZT with optimized NS:NH ratios delivers effective, high-performing, environmentally sustainable alternatives to traditional cement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105386
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolymer stabilization of expansive soils using zeolitic tuff: A sustainable alternative to cement-based stabilization

Nikos D. Lagaros, Hussein Aldeeky, Khairedin M. Abdalla, Rasil Kodah et al.
14 citations
Results in Engineering
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
13.34
article

Geopolymer stabilization of expansive soils using zeolitic tuff: A sustainable alternative to cement-based stabilization

Nikos D. Lagaros, Hussein Aldeeky, Khairedin M. Abdalla, Rasil Kodah, amer Rabab’ah
article en
14 citations

Abstract

• Zeolitic Tuff-based geopolymers offer a low-carbon alternative to traditional cement. • Geopolymer treatment cuts free swell to 0.25%, improving volume stability. • MEPDG shows reduced rutting, fatigue cracking and improved structure in stabilized layers. • SEM confirms a dense matrix-forming, enhancing soil strength and stability The effectiveness of zeolitic tuff (ZT) based geopolymer stabilization as a sustainable alternative to conventional cement stabilization for expansive soils is investigated in this study. Mechanical and geotechnical properties of geopolymer stabilized soil are evaluated in terms of ZT content, sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide (NS:NH) ratio and curing time. Soil improvement was assessed by laboratory tests, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), plasticity, compaction, and free swell tests. The test results show that the geopolymer stabilization increases the UCS significantly, as the NS:NH=2:1 mixture attains the maximum UCS of about 5.0 MPa in 28 days of curing, representing a 40% increase over 12% cement-stabilized soil. Furthermore, geopolymer-stabilized soils show a higher swelling reduction with free swell percentages as low as 0.25%, a 42% improvement compared to cement. The environmental assessment shows a 19% lower CO₂ emission per MPa of strength for geopolymer stabilization compared to cement-based stabilization, making it an eco-friendly choice. Pavement performance analysis using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) indicates that geopolymer-stabilized subbase layers improve structural integrity while reducing overall pavement rutting and fatigue cracking. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) results validate the creation of a dense geopolymer matrix structure that enhances the strength and stability characteristics of soil materials. The study concludes that geopolymer stabilization using ZT with optimized NS:NH ratios delivers effective, high-performing, environmentally sustainable alternatives to traditional cement.

Results in EngineeringVol. 26
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Hashemite University (JO), National Technical University of Athens (GR)
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
13.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.