Enhancing Students' van Hiele Geometric Thinking Levels Through the Integration of Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) in Geometry Learning

Van Hiele’s theory of geometric thinking describes a hierarchical progression through distinct levels, from basic visualization to advanced deductive reasoning. Students typically struggle to transition between these levels without appropriate instructional support. Dynamic geometry software, such as Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP), has been shown to facilitate this transition by providing interactive visualizations and exploratory learning experiences. By allowing students to manipulate geometric shapes and observe properties dynamically, GSP enhances conceptual understanding and promotes higher-order thinking. This study aims to analyze the development of students' geometric thinking levels on geometry topics based on Van Hiele's theory after instruction using Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP). The research employed a qualitative approach, involving three participants from Class VIIG of a junior high school in Mojokerto, Indonesia, representing high, medium, and low ability levels. Data were collected through a test consisting of three questions designed to assess students' geometric understanding across various indicators of Van Hiele's thinking levels, followed by in-depth interviews. The findings revealed that GSP-based learning was effective in enhancing students' geometric thinking. Subjects ST and SD demonstrated significant progress, with several indicators advancing from Level 0 (Visualization) to Level 2 (Informal Deduction). In contrast, subject SR exhibited limited improvement, with most indicators remaining at Level 1 (Analysis). These results highlight GSP's potential to support students in developing a deeper understanding of geometric concepts. This study provides valuable insights for designing learning strategies tailored to the diverse needs and abilities of students, aiming to facilitate higher levels of geometric thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qubahan Academic Journal
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n2a1639
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Students' van Hiele Geometric Thinking Levels Through the Integration of Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) in Geometry Learning

Sri Irawati, Sugi Hartono, Diena Frentika, Heru Tri Novi Rizki et al.
Qubahan Academic Journal
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Enhancing Students' van Hiele Geometric Thinking Levels Through the Integration of Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) in Geometry Learning

Sri Irawati, Sugi Hartono, Diena Frentika, Heru Tri Novi Rizki, Rezky Ramadhona
article en

Abstract

Van Hiele’s theory of geometric thinking describes a hierarchical progression through distinct levels, from basic visualization to advanced deductive reasoning. Students typically struggle to transition between these levels without appropriate instructional support. Dynamic geometry software, such as Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP), has been shown to facilitate this transition by providing interactive visualizations and exploratory learning experiences. By allowing students to manipulate geometric shapes and observe properties dynamically, GSP enhances conceptual understanding and promotes higher-order thinking. This study aims to analyze the development of students' geometric thinking levels on geometry topics based on Van Hiele's theory after instruction using Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP). The research employed a qualitative approach, involving three participants from Class VIIG of a junior high school in Mojokerto, Indonesia, representing high, medium, and low ability levels. Data were collected through a test consisting of three questions designed to assess students' geometric understanding across various indicators of Van Hiele's thinking levels, followed by in-depth interviews. The findings revealed that GSP-based learning was effective in enhancing students' geometric thinking. Subjects ST and SD demonstrated significant progress, with several indicators advancing from Level 0 (Visualization) to Level 2 (Informal Deduction). In contrast, subject SR exhibited limited improvement, with most indicators remaining at Level 1 (Analysis). These results highlight GSP's potential to support students in developing a deeper understanding of geometric concepts. This study provides valuable insights for designing learning strategies tailored to the diverse needs and abilities of students, aiming to facilitate higher levels of geometric thinking.

Qubahan Academic JournalVol. 5(2)
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.