Effectiveness of PICRAT and POWER Writing Models in Enhancing the Writing Skills of Students

Writing proficiency is a fundamental skill necessary for academic success, yet many Junior High School students struggle with key writing components. This quasi-experimental study assessed the effectiveness of the PICRAT and POWER writing models on the writing skills of 76 Grade 9 students. PICRAT was administered to 38 students and POWER to another 38, using pre- and post-tests evaluated through a standardized rubric. Results showed significant improvements in all writing dimensions for both groups. PICRAT demonstrated greater effectiveness with post-test mean scores (Content = 4.55, SD = 0.30; Grammar = 4.54, SD = 0.33; Organization = 4.49, SD = 0.30; Vocabulary = 4.52, SD = 0.26; Mechanics = 4.50, SD = 0.31) compared to POWER (Content = 3.11, SD = 0.65; Grammar = 2.87, SD = 0.74; Organization = 2.98, SD = 0.59; Vocabulary = 3.13, SD = 0.74; Mechanics = 2.86, SD = 0.58). ANCOVA confirmed statistical significance (F = 27.165, p < .001), with a partial eta squared of .271. Findings support integrating structured, tech-enhanced writing interventions like PICRAT in curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.371004
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Media Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of PICRAT and POWER Writing Models in Enhancing the Writing Skills of Students

Anjenet Labor
Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal
Educational Methods and Media Use
article

Effectiveness of PICRAT and POWER Writing Models in Enhancing the Writing Skills of Students

Anjenet Labor
article en

Abstract

Writing proficiency is a fundamental skill necessary for academic success, yet many Junior High School students struggle with key writing components. This quasi-experimental study assessed the effectiveness of the PICRAT and POWER writing models on the writing skills of 76 Grade 9 students. PICRAT was administered to 38 students and POWER to another 38, using pre- and post-tests evaluated through a standardized rubric. Results showed significant improvements in all writing dimensions for both groups. PICRAT demonstrated greater effectiveness with post-test mean scores (Content = 4.55, SD = 0.30; Grammar = 4.54, SD = 0.33; Organization = 4.49, SD = 0.30; Vocabulary = 4.52, SD = 0.26; Mechanics = 4.50, SD = 0.31) compared to POWER (Content = 3.11, SD = 0.65; Grammar = 2.87, SD = 0.74; Organization = 2.98, SD = 0.59; Vocabulary = 3.13, SD = 0.74; Mechanics = 2.86, SD = 0.58). ANCOVA confirmed statistical significance (F = 27.165, p < .001), with a partial eta squared of .271. Findings support integrating structured, tech-enhanced writing interventions like PICRAT in curricula.

Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary JournalVol. 37(10)
Liceo de Cagayan University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Educational Methods and Media Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.