Longitudinal Associations of Perceived Media Parenting with Adolescent Mental Health: Mediation by Social Efficacy and Online Risk

Abstract Concerns have been rising about links between digital media use and mental health problems among adolescents. Media parenting has been identified as a critical strategy to reducing risk. Although research has found relationships between online risk behaviors such as cyberbullying and overuse to reduced social skills, depression, and anxiety, few studies have examined the protective mechanisms whereby media parenting may promote emotional, psychological, and social well-being. Based on past research, we hypothesized that social efficacy and online risk would mediate the relationship between media parenting and early adolescents’ mental health. We recruited parents of 10–14-year-old children nationally via Qualtrics; parents referred their children in fall 2019. The analytic sample included 129 early adolescents who completed the second (spring 2020) or third wave (spring 2021). We conducted path analyses to test the hypotheses. Social efficacy at wave 2 mediated the relationship between active media parenting at wave 1 and youth mental health at wave 3. Restrictive media parenting at wave 1 predicted reductions in online risk taking at wave 2 but was not related to mental health at wave 3. Results imply more than one media parenting strategy may be important to promote healthy online use and mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-025-03075-2
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal Associations of Perceived Media Parenting with Adolescent Mental Health: Mediation by Social Efficacy and Online Risk

Tyler S. Nesbit, Beatrice Pierre, Liva LaMontagne, Xiaoqi Ma et al.
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

Longitudinal Associations of Perceived Media Parenting with Adolescent Mental Health: Mediation by Social Efficacy and Online Risk

Tyler S. Nesbit, Beatrice Pierre, Liva LaMontagne, Xiaoqi Ma, Joy Gabrielli, J. Doty, Cathleen R. Rabideau
article en

Abstract

Abstract Concerns have been rising about links between digital media use and mental health problems among adolescents. Media parenting has been identified as a critical strategy to reducing risk. Although research has found relationships between online risk behaviors such as cyberbullying and overuse to reduced social skills, depression, and anxiety, few studies have examined the protective mechanisms whereby media parenting may promote emotional, psychological, and social well-being. Based on past research, we hypothesized that social efficacy and online risk would mediate the relationship between media parenting and early adolescents’ mental health. We recruited parents of 10–14-year-old children nationally via Qualtrics; parents referred their children in fall 2019. The analytic sample included 129 early adolescents who completed the second (spring 2020) or third wave (spring 2021). We conducted path analyses to test the hypotheses. Social efficacy at wave 2 mediated the relationship between active media parenting at wave 1 and youth mental health at wave 3. Restrictive media parenting at wave 1 predicted reductions in online risk taking at wave 2 but was not related to mental health at wave 3. Results imply more than one media parenting strategy may be important to promote healthy online use and mental health.

Journal of Child and Family StudiesVol. 34(7)
University of Oregon (US), Oregon Department of Education (US), University of Florida Health (US), University of Florida (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.