Exploring the Experiences of Tertiary students in using Artificial Intelligence (AI)

This study explores the experiences of tertiary students in Benguet in using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Employing a mixed-method research design, the study gathered quantitative data through electronic surveys from 66 tertiary students and qualitative data via semi-structured interviews with 12 students from three Higher Education Institutions in Benguet. The research analyzed the types of AI tools used, how students utilize them, the challenges encountered, and their adaptive strategies. The findings reveal that students commonly use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Cici, and Grammarly primarily for information acquisition, grammar checking, and enhancing outputs. Efficiency and convenience is identified as a common reason why students use these AI tools. This study higlights two main approaches to AI including AI-assisted shortcutting, where students heavily rely on AI-generated output with minimal intervention, and Human-in-the-loop (HITL), involving more human control through collaborative ideation, content improvement, text mining, and plagiarism detection. The study highlights several challenges, including limited accessibility to premium AI features, and inconsistent internet connectivity. It identified perceived challenges such as inaccuracies and insufficient data on specific topics like indigenous knowledge, lexical complexity of AI language, and issues such as the potential for AI dependency and plagiarism. In response to these challenges, students employ cross-referencing with traditional resources and tool-chain integration to verify information and enhance AI-generated content. The study concludes that while generative AI offers convenience, its misuse can lead to inaccurate outputs, AI dependency, and plagiarism. It recommends that educational stakeholders should develop AI policies and implement AI literacy programs to guide students toward the effective and ethical integration of AI in their learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science and Humanities Journal
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v9i05.1833
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Technology and Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Experiences of Tertiary students in using Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Adriane Love Ignas
2 citations
Social Science and Humanities Journal
Technology and Data Analysis
6.49
article

Exploring the Experiences of Tertiary students in using Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Adriane Love Ignas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study explores the experiences of tertiary students in Benguet in using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Employing a mixed-method research design, the study gathered quantitative data through electronic surveys from 66 tertiary students and qualitative data via semi-structured interviews with 12 students from three Higher Education Institutions in Benguet. The research analyzed the types of AI tools used, how students utilize them, the challenges encountered, and their adaptive strategies. The findings reveal that students commonly use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Cici, and Grammarly primarily for information acquisition, grammar checking, and enhancing outputs. Efficiency and convenience is identified as a common reason why students use these AI tools. This study higlights two main approaches to AI including AI-assisted shortcutting, where students heavily rely on AI-generated output with minimal intervention, and Human-in-the-loop (HITL), involving more human control through collaborative ideation, content improvement, text mining, and plagiarism detection. The study highlights several challenges, including limited accessibility to premium AI features, and inconsistent internet connectivity. It identified perceived challenges such as inaccuracies and insufficient data on specific topics like indigenous knowledge, lexical complexity of AI language, and issues such as the potential for AI dependency and plagiarism. In response to these challenges, students employ cross-referencing with traditional resources and tool-chain integration to verify information and enhance AI-generated content. The study concludes that while generative AI offers convenience, its misuse can lead to inaccurate outputs, AI dependency, and plagiarism. It recommends that educational stakeholders should develop AI policies and implement AI literacy programs to guide students toward the effective and ethical integration of AI in their learning.

Social Science and Humanities JournalVol. 9(05)
Benguet State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Technology and Data Analysis
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Experiences of Tertiary students in using Artificial Intelligence (AI) — Adriane Love Ignas · Social Science and Humanities Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS