COPD patients with non-small cell lung cancer respond better to anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors

In studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1/ligand 1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-(L)1) among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), smokers tend to have better clinical outcomes than non-smokers. However, it is unclear whether NSCLC patients with co-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have better clinical outcomes than patients without COPD, regardless of smoking history. The potential correlation of COPD with an improved response to anti-PD-(L)1 was examined in a large cohort of patients with available pulmonary function test results. Patients with stage IV NSCLC who received a minimum of two doses of anti-PD-(L)1 across various treatment lines from 2015 to 2021 were enrolled. Among the 387 patients, pulmonary function test (PFT) data were available for 234 (61%), 139 (59%) of whom had spirometry diagnosed COPD. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on the presence or absence of COPD. In the univariate analyses, both PFS and OS significantly improved among patients with COPD, compared with patients who did not have COPD (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89 for PFS; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.92 for OS), regardless of smoking status. In the multivariate analyses, PFS and OS remained superior among patients with COPD (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85 for PFS; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.85 for OS). Additionally, patients with milder COPD (GOLD 1/2 vs. 3/4) had better clinical outcomes than patients with more severe disease. However, neither lung distension (defined as a total lung capacity > 120%) nor pre-COPD status (defined as a diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide < 70%) had a significant impact on PFS or OS. Our study, conducted in the largest cohort with available PFT data to date, showed that COPD was associated with improved survival outcomes among patients with stage IV NSCLC who received anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, regardless of smoking history. The differences were mainly driven by mild and moderate obstruction (GOLD 1 and 2). The dysregulated PD-1/PD-L1 expression that occurs in COPD may offer insights into the different outcomes and thus warrants further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02251-0
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COPD patients with non-small cell lung cancer respond better to anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors

Charline Caumont, M. Zysman, M. Duruisseaux, Iban Larrouture et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
5.23
article

COPD patients with non-small cell lung cancer respond better to anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors

Charline Caumont, M. Zysman, M. Duruisseaux, Iban Larrouture, Augustin Boudoussier, Pierre Schilfarth, Camille Chautemps, Pauline Henrot, Claire Bardel, Rémi Veillon
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1/ligand 1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-(L)1) among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), smokers tend to have better clinical outcomes than non-smokers. However, it is unclear whether NSCLC patients with co-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have better clinical outcomes than patients without COPD, regardless of smoking history. The potential correlation of COPD with an improved response to anti-PD-(L)1 was examined in a large cohort of patients with available pulmonary function test results. Patients with stage IV NSCLC who received a minimum of two doses of anti-PD-(L)1 across various treatment lines from 2015 to 2021 were enrolled. Among the 387 patients, pulmonary function test (PFT) data were available for 234 (61%), 139 (59%) of whom had spirometry diagnosed COPD. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on the presence or absence of COPD. In the univariate analyses, both PFS and OS significantly improved among patients with COPD, compared with patients who did not have COPD (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89 for PFS; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.92 for OS), regardless of smoking status. In the multivariate analyses, PFS and OS remained superior among patients with COPD (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85 for PFS; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.85 for OS). Additionally, patients with milder COPD (GOLD 1/2 vs. 3/4) had better clinical outcomes than patients with more severe disease. However, neither lung distension (defined as a total lung capacity > 120%) nor pre-COPD status (defined as a diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide < 70%) had a significant impact on PFS or OS. Our study, conducted in the largest cohort with available PFT data to date, showed that COPD was associated with improved survival outcomes among patients with stage IV NSCLC who received anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, regardless of smoking history. The differences were mainly driven by mild and moderate obstruction (GOLD 1 and 2). The dysregulated PD-1/PD-L1 expression that occurs in COPD may offer insights into the different outcomes and thus warrants further investigation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (FR), Hôpital Louis Pradel (FR), Centre de Recherche Cardio-Thoracique de Bordeaux (FR), Physiopathologie et Epidémiologie des Maladies Respiratoires (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
5.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.