The nexus between poverty reduction and carbon emissions: Insights from Hubei, China during the Targeted Poverty Alleviation Period

• This study examines the nexus between poverty reduction and carbon emissions. • Spatial-temporal analysis supports the win-win hypothesis at the county level. • CO₂ sequestration through vegetation promotes poverty alleviation while reducing carbon emissions. • GDP growth, electricity consumption, and agriculture show complex impacts on poverty reduction and emissions. • CCER trading mechanisms provide effective ecological poverty alleviation pathways. Wiping out poverty while controlling carbon emissions is a major challenge of our time. China eradicated extreme poverty in 2020 through the targeted poverty alleviation (TPA) strategy, providing a unique case to examine the poverty-carbon nexus at the subnational level. This paper investigates the nexus between county-level poverty reduction and carbon emissions in Hubei province during the TPA period. Our findings support the win-win hypothesis, indicating that poverty reduction and emissions control can be achieved simultaneously. CO₂ sequestration through vegetation emerged as a key factor benefiting both objectives, with a 1% increase reducing poverty by 0.42% and lowering carbon emissions by 0.19%. Economic growth contributed to poverty alleviation but increased emissions: a 1% rise in GDP reduced poverty by 0.44% while raising emissions by 0.70%. Conversely, a 1% increase in electricity consumption raised poverty by 0.46% and lowered emissions by 0.12%. Agricultural development showed a 1% increase correlated with 0.52% higher poverty and 0.17% higher emissions. “Carbon Sink+” trading mechanisms facilitated ecological poverty alleviation in impoverished areas. Panel causality analysis confirms a bidirectional relationship between poverty reduction and carbon emissions. These findings highlight the potential for integrated strategies that advance both poverty alleviation and emissions reduction while considering the complex socioeconomic dynamics necessary to achieve sustainable development goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geography and sustainability
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100308
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The nexus between poverty reduction and carbon emissions: Insights from Hubei, China during the Targeted Poverty Alleviation Period

Yong Ge, Mengxiao Liu
Geography and sustainability
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

The nexus between poverty reduction and carbon emissions: Insights from Hubei, China during the Targeted Poverty Alleviation Period

Yong Ge, Mengxiao Liu
article en

Abstract

• This study examines the nexus between poverty reduction and carbon emissions. • Spatial-temporal analysis supports the win-win hypothesis at the county level. • CO₂ sequestration through vegetation promotes poverty alleviation while reducing carbon emissions. • GDP growth, electricity consumption, and agriculture show complex impacts on poverty reduction and emissions. • CCER trading mechanisms provide effective ecological poverty alleviation pathways. Wiping out poverty while controlling carbon emissions is a major challenge of our time. China eradicated extreme poverty in 2020 through the targeted poverty alleviation (TPA) strategy, providing a unique case to examine the poverty-carbon nexus at the subnational level. This paper investigates the nexus between county-level poverty reduction and carbon emissions in Hubei province during the TPA period. Our findings support the win-win hypothesis, indicating that poverty reduction and emissions control can be achieved simultaneously. CO₂ sequestration through vegetation emerged as a key factor benefiting both objectives, with a 1% increase reducing poverty by 0.42% and lowering carbon emissions by 0.19%. Economic growth contributed to poverty alleviation but increased emissions: a 1% rise in GDP reduced poverty by 0.44% while raising emissions by 0.70%. Conversely, a 1% increase in electricity consumption raised poverty by 0.46% and lowered emissions by 0.12%. Agricultural development showed a 1% increase correlated with 0.52% higher poverty and 0.17% higher emissions. “Carbon Sink+” trading mechanisms facilitated ecological poverty alleviation in impoverished areas. Panel causality analysis confirms a bidirectional relationship between poverty reduction and carbon emissions. These findings highlight the potential for integrated strategies that advance both poverty alleviation and emissions reduction while considering the complex socioeconomic dynamics necessary to achieve sustainable development goals.

Geography and sustainabilityVol. 6(4)
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Jiangxi Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.