Strategic shame management – Leveraging individual footprints to nudge sustainable development goal 12

In the pursuit of United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG12) – ‘Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns’ - a significant challenge persists: the misalignment between consumer demand for environmentally harmful products and the need for sustainable manufacturing practices. Through seven workshops with consumers, manufacturers, and academics, we explore innovative solutions using systems thinking. Our key finding reveals that calculating individual ecological footprints can catalyse change by triggering guilt in consumers and shame in manufacturers. We propose a three-stage model for policymakers to nudge gradual yet structural changes towards SDG12 by implementing rankings targeting the most polluting supply chains. This research offers theoretical insights into emotion-driven sustainability efforts and practical guidance for industry leaders to align consumer behaviour and manufacturing practices with global sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.04.018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic shame management – Leveraging individual footprints to nudge sustainable development goal 12

Ahmet Ağca, Nikolai Kazantsev, Kamran Ali Chatha, Jan Godsell et al.
2 citations
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
4.89
article

Strategic shame management – Leveraging individual footprints to nudge sustainable development goal 12

Ahmet Ağca, Nikolai Kazantsev, Kamran Ali Chatha, Jan Godsell, Orsolya-Anna Mate
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the pursuit of United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG12) – ‘Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns’ - a significant challenge persists: the misalignment between consumer demand for environmentally harmful products and the need for sustainable manufacturing practices. Through seven workshops with consumers, manufacturers, and academics, we explore innovative solutions using systems thinking. Our key finding reveals that calculating individual ecological footprints can catalyse change by triggering guilt in consumers and shame in manufacturers. We propose a three-stage model for policymakers to nudge gradual yet structural changes towards SDG12 by implementing rankings targeting the most polluting supply chains. This research offers theoretical insights into emotion-driven sustainability efforts and practical guidance for industry leaders to align consumer behaviour and manufacturing practices with global sustainability goals.

Sustainable Production and ConsumptionVol. 57
Aston University (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Loughborough College (GB), University of Warwick (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
4.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategic shame management – Leveraging individual footprints to nudge sustainable development goal 12 — Ahmet Ağca, Nikolai Kazantsev, et al. · Sustainable Production and Consumption (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS