Gustatory and olfactory-guided responsiveness to maltodextrin solutions in mice

Rodents avidly consume maltodextrin solutions. Oligosaccharides appear to generate a detectable oral perception distinct from basic tastes in rodents and humans. Mice lacking one or both subunits of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer still display relatively normal preference for maltodextrins but have severely blunted responsiveness to sugars. To test whether taste contributes to maltodextrin responsiveness, we performed lingual gustatory nerve transection (NX) in mice with [wild-type (WT)] and without [knockout (KO)] functional T1R3 subunits. Mice were then tested, after a ∼23-h fast, for concentration-dependent licking responses to Maltrin, a maltodextrin, and sucrose in a brief-access paradigm, which minimizes postingestive influences on responsiveness. Compared with SHAM mice, NX mice displayed blunted lick responses and initiated fewer trials to Maltrin. The KO mice exhibited some concentration-dependent licking to sucrose, though attenuated, which may be due to flavor-nutrient learning across sessions. However, NX blunted this responsiveness in all mice. The results suggest that an intact chorda tympani and/or glossopharyngeal nerve(s) is required for normal licking to maltodextrin and sucrose solutions, confirming a contribution of gustatory signals to behavior. A follow-up experiment tested whether olfactory signals contribute to Maltrin detection in mice trained in a Go/No-Go task. Mice could detect the volatiles associated with Maltrin in a concentration-dependent manner. As maltodextrins have negligible vapor pressure, mice are likely responding to volatile contaminants within the solution, which could potentially serve as cues for flavor-nutrient conditioning. Nevertheless, there is clearly a gustatory component that unconditionally drives hedonic responsiveness to this stimulus.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Maltodextrins have long been believed to be tasteless and odorless and are commonly used in food production. Previous research suggests that maltodextrins elicit a distinct taste, separate from other carbohydrate stimuli like sugars, in both rodents and humans. Our findings provide compelling evidence that ingestive responsiveness to maltodextrins in mice relies on signaling in gustatory nerves. Furthermore, rodents can detect this stimulus via olfaction. Olfactory cues may contribute to flavor-nutrient conditioning when taste is removed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00275.2024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gustatory and olfactory-guided responsiveness to maltodextrin solutions in mice

Ellie Williams, Ginger D. Blonde, Adam Dewan, Alan C. Spector et al.
2 citations
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
2.24
article

Gustatory and olfactory-guided responsiveness to maltodextrin solutions in mice

Ellie Williams, Ginger D. Blonde, Adam Dewan, Alan C. Spector, Elizabeth A. Hamel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Rodents avidly consume maltodextrin solutions. Oligosaccharides appear to generate a detectable oral perception distinct from basic tastes in rodents and humans. Mice lacking one or both subunits of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer still display relatively normal preference for maltodextrins but have severely blunted responsiveness to sugars. To test whether taste contributes to maltodextrin responsiveness, we performed lingual gustatory nerve transection (NX) in mice with [wild-type (WT)] and without [knockout (KO)] functional T1R3 subunits. Mice were then tested, after a ∼23-h fast, for concentration-dependent licking responses to Maltrin, a maltodextrin, and sucrose in a brief-access paradigm, which minimizes postingestive influences on responsiveness. Compared with SHAM mice, NX mice displayed blunted lick responses and initiated fewer trials to Maltrin. The KO mice exhibited some concentration-dependent licking to sucrose, though attenuated, which may be due to flavor-nutrient learning across sessions. However, NX blunted this responsiveness in all mice. The results suggest that an intact chorda tympani and/or glossopharyngeal nerve(s) is required for normal licking to maltodextrin and sucrose solutions, confirming a contribution of gustatory signals to behavior. A follow-up experiment tested whether olfactory signals contribute to Maltrin detection in mice trained in a Go/No-Go task. Mice could detect the volatiles associated with Maltrin in a concentration-dependent manner. As maltodextrins have negligible vapor pressure, mice are likely responding to volatile contaminants within the solution, which could potentially serve as cues for flavor-nutrient conditioning. Nevertheless, there is clearly a gustatory component that unconditionally drives hedonic responsiveness to this stimulus.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Maltodextrins have long been believed to be tasteless and odorless and are commonly used in food production. Previous research suggests that maltodextrins elicit a distinct taste, separate from other carbohydrate stimuli like sugars, in both rodents and humans. Our findings provide compelling evidence that ingestive responsiveness to maltodextrins in mice relies on signaling in gustatory nerves. Furthermore, rodents can detect this stimulus via olfaction. Olfactory cues may contribute to flavor-nutrient conditioning when taste is removed.

American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologyVol. 329(1)
Florida State University (US)
Whitehall Foundation, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
2.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.