Management practices on inclusive education in Malilipot District

The study utilized a descriptive survey method to evaluate inclusive education management practices in Malilipot District across five variables: needs assessment, strategies and policies, resource allocation, monitoring and evaluation, and continuous improvement. Data were gathered from 222 respondents—14 school heads and 208 teachers. Secondary sources included published and unpublished research, books, journals, online materials, and official issuances from the Department of Education and the Philippine Government. Relevant documents from other institutions were also examined. Collected data were systematically processed and presented in tables for analysis and interpretation, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of management practices in inclusive education. Findings: The findings of the study are the following: Continuous improvement was the most frequently practiced management approach in inclusive education (68.02%), followed by strategies and policies (65.77%). Resource mobilization was least implemented (53.60%). Needs assessment was consistently applied (4.45), with assessment tools as the most used activity (4.56) and surveys as the least (4.32). Strategies and policies (4.54) prioritized pupil participation (4.68) over policy development (4.46). Resource mobilization (4.26) emphasized budget allocation (4.36), while infrastructure access received less attention (4.22). Monitoring and evaluation (4.41) focused on pupil progress (4.50) over stakeholder involvement (4.27). Continuous improvement (4.42) prioritized feedback mechanisms (4.52), with teacher training as the least practiced (4.32). Significant differences existed in strategies and policies (F=7.38), resource mobilization (F=26.96), and continuous improvement (F=8.03), while none were noted in needs assessment (F=1.26) and monitoring (F=0.07). Challenges included limited assessment tools, engagement difficulties, lack of materials, unclear evaluation frameworks, and minimal parental involvement. Management plans were proposed to address these concerns.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.15.2.1286
Primary Topic
African Education and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management practices on inclusive education in Malilipot District

Clarence Climacosa Bonaobra
1 links
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
African Education and Politics
article

Management practices on inclusive education in Malilipot District

Clarence Climacosa Bonaobra
article en

Abstract

The study utilized a descriptive survey method to evaluate inclusive education management practices in Malilipot District across five variables: needs assessment, strategies and policies, resource allocation, monitoring and evaluation, and continuous improvement. Data were gathered from 222 respondents—14 school heads and 208 teachers. Secondary sources included published and unpublished research, books, journals, online materials, and official issuances from the Department of Education and the Philippine Government. Relevant documents from other institutions were also examined. Collected data were systematically processed and presented in tables for analysis and interpretation, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of management practices in inclusive education. Findings: The findings of the study are the following: Continuous improvement was the most frequently practiced management approach in inclusive education (68.02%), followed by strategies and policies (65.77%). Resource mobilization was least implemented (53.60%). Needs assessment was consistently applied (4.45), with assessment tools as the most used activity (4.56) and surveys as the least (4.32). Strategies and policies (4.54) prioritized pupil participation (4.68) over policy development (4.46). Resource mobilization (4.26) emphasized budget allocation (4.36), while infrastructure access received less attention (4.22). Monitoring and evaluation (4.41) focused on pupil progress (4.50) over stakeholder involvement (4.27). Continuous improvement (4.42) prioritized feedback mechanisms (4.52), with teacher training as the least practiced (4.32). Significant differences existed in strategies and policies (F=7.38), resource mobilization (F=26.96), and continuous improvement (F=8.03), while none were noted in needs assessment (F=1.26) and monitoring (F=0.07). Challenges included limited assessment tools, engagement difficulties, lack of materials, unclear evaluation frameworks, and minimal parental involvement. Management plans were proposed to address these concerns.

International Journal of Science and Research ArchiveVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
African Education and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Management practices on inclusive education in Malilipot District — Clarence Climacosa Bonaobra · International Journal of Science and Research Archive (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS