On the universality of aesthetic preference and inference: a cross-cultural (Chinese–German) study

Abstract Aesthetic preferences vary widely among individuals and across cultures. These culture-specific aesthetic preferences are reflected in the environment, artistic behaviour, and consumer choices. People have the ability to infer the aesthetic preferences of others within their own culture through their Theory of Aesthetic Preferences , which is a subcategory of the Theory of Mind. An important question is whether people can also infer aesthetic preferences across different cultures. This study aimed to investigate aesthetic preference and aesthetic inference, as well as the underlying mental processes of beauty judgements such as affective and cognitive responses, by comparing ratings on beauty, affective, and cognitive dimensions from participants in China ( n = 84) and Germany ( n = 82). The results suggest that aesthetic preferences are more dependent on the stimuli than on the culture. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that beauty judgements, as well as intra- and inter-cultural beauty inferences, are generally associated with positive emotions, while the relationship between beauty judgement and cognitive stimulation seems to be culture-specific. Overall, our findings provide evidence for a universal human beauty response mechanism that is linked to positive emotions and support the idea of a universal Theory of Aesthetic Preferences . This theory enables people to infer the aesthetic preferences of others both within and across different cultures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04806-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Color perception and design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the universality of aesthetic preference and inference: a cross-cultural (Chinese–German) study

Ronald Hübner, Keshun Zhang, Chantal A. Miller
3 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Color perception and design
7.32
article

On the universality of aesthetic preference and inference: a cross-cultural (Chinese–German) study

Ronald Hübner, Keshun Zhang, Chantal A. Miller
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aesthetic preferences vary widely among individuals and across cultures. These culture-specific aesthetic preferences are reflected in the environment, artistic behaviour, and consumer choices. People have the ability to infer the aesthetic preferences of others within their own culture through their Theory of Aesthetic Preferences , which is a subcategory of the Theory of Mind. An important question is whether people can also infer aesthetic preferences across different cultures. This study aimed to investigate aesthetic preference and aesthetic inference, as well as the underlying mental processes of beauty judgements such as affective and cognitive responses, by comparing ratings on beauty, affective, and cognitive dimensions from participants in China ( n = 84) and Germany ( n = 82). The results suggest that aesthetic preferences are more dependent on the stimuli than on the culture. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that beauty judgements, as well as intra- and inter-cultural beauty inferences, are generally associated with positive emotions, while the relationship between beauty judgement and cognitive stimulation seems to be culture-specific. Overall, our findings provide evidence for a universal human beauty response mechanism that is linked to positive emotions and support the idea of a universal Theory of Aesthetic Preferences . This theory enables people to infer the aesthetic preferences of others both within and across different cultures.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Qingdao University (CN), University of Konstanz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Color perception and design
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.