LLM cross-validation frameworks: Mitigating hallucinations in enterprise content generation systems

This article examines the efficacy of using one language learning model (LLM) to validate the outputs of another as a quality assurance mechanism in content generation workflows. Drawing from a comprehensive experiment conducted during the Prime Video Project Remaster Launch, it demonstrates the implementation of a dual-LLM verification system designed to detect and reduce hallucinations in automatically generated book summaries. It also demonstrates that while LLM cross-validation significantly improves content accuracy through iterative prompt refinement and systematic error detection, it cannot completely eliminate hallucination issues inherent to generative AI systems. This article provides valuable insights for organizations seeking to balance the efficiency of automated content generation with the need for factual accuracy, particularly in customer-facing applications where trust and reliability are paramount.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2025.15.2.0722
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Rights Management and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLM cross-validation frameworks: Mitigating hallucinations in enterprise content generation systems

Anupam Chansarkar
1 citations
World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences
Digital Rights Management and Security
3.25
article

LLM cross-validation frameworks: Mitigating hallucinations in enterprise content generation systems

Anupam Chansarkar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines the efficacy of using one language learning model (LLM) to validate the outputs of another as a quality assurance mechanism in content generation workflows. Drawing from a comprehensive experiment conducted during the Prime Video Project Remaster Launch, it demonstrates the implementation of a dual-LLM verification system designed to detect and reduce hallucinations in automatically generated book summaries. It also demonstrates that while LLM cross-validation significantly improves content accuracy through iterative prompt refinement and systematic error detection, it cannot completely eliminate hallucination issues inherent to generative AI systems. This article provides valuable insights for organizations seeking to balance the efficiency of automated content generation with the need for factual accuracy, particularly in customer-facing applications where trust and reliability are paramount.

World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and SciencesVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital Rights Management and Security
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.