Social processing of dynamic naturalistic social interactions

Research suggests that static depictions of social interactions preferentially capture our attention compared to non-interactions. Research also suggests that motion captures attention. To date, therefore, it is unknown whether <i>dynamic</i> social interactions preferentially capture attention relative to non-interactions, over and above motion cues. The present study captured 81 participants' eye-gaze when viewing 4-s video clips of social interactions compared to motion-matched non-interactions. We hypothesised that participants would spend more time looking at the two agents in the videos relative to the background when viewing social interactions compared to non-interactions. Results confirmed our hypothesis and demonstrated that this effect was stronger for individuals with greater empathy and lower autistic traits. These results add to the growing body of research investigating the processing of social interactions in complex, naturalistic stimuli and demonstrate that social interactions do preferentially capture attention, even when motion cues are present.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251346724
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social processing of dynamic naturalistic social interactions

Katie Daughters, Kami Koldewyn, Simona Skripkauskaitė
1 citations
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
article

Social processing of dynamic naturalistic social interactions

Katie Daughters, Kami Koldewyn, Simona Skripkauskaitė
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research suggests that static depictions of social interactions preferentially capture our attention compared to non-interactions. Research also suggests that motion captures attention. To date, therefore, it is unknown whether <i>dynamic</i> social interactions preferentially capture attention relative to non-interactions, over and above motion cues. The present study captured 81 participants' eye-gaze when viewing 4-s video clips of social interactions compared to motion-matched non-interactions. We hypothesised that participants would spend more time looking at the two agents in the videos relative to the background when viewing social interactions compared to non-interactions. Results confirmed our hypothesis and demonstrated that this effect was stronger for individuals with greater empathy and lower autistic traits. These results add to the growing body of research investigating the processing of social interactions in complex, naturalistic stimuli and demonstrate that social interactions do preferentially capture attention, even when motion cues are present.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 79(2)
University of Essex (GB), Bangor University (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
University of Essex, European Commission, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.