Towards equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility: Governance archetypes and their relations

• Identifies five governance archetypes in transport systems. • Proposes a framework linking archetypes to governance configurations. • Highlights the interplay of values, causal attributions, and rationales. • Offers conceptual tools to facilitate problem structuring in complex mobility contexts. This study examines expert perceptions on achieving equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility and transport development. Through qualitative interview analysis, we identify five archetypes with distinct core values, causal attributions, and rationales: the Institutional Architect, Behaviour & Culture Challenger, Equity Champion, Resource Optimiser, and Inclusive Mobiliser. We propose a framework to consider these archetypes relationally along the dimensions of ‘orientation’ (system | people) and ‘approach’ (incremental | transformative). We discuss the implications of our findings, highlighting their potential in diverse, pluralistic decision-making environments characteristic of mobility and transport planning. Our study contributes a framework and conceptual repertoire of archetypes to support constructive decision-making in complex contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104797
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility: Governance archetypes and their relations

Katharina Bürger
2 citations
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Towards equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility: Governance archetypes and their relations

Katharina Bürger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Identifies five governance archetypes in transport systems. • Proposes a framework linking archetypes to governance configurations. • Highlights the interplay of values, causal attributions, and rationales. • Offers conceptual tools to facilitate problem structuring in complex mobility contexts. This study examines expert perceptions on achieving equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility and transport development. Through qualitative interview analysis, we identify five archetypes with distinct core values, causal attributions, and rationales: the Institutional Architect, Behaviour & Culture Challenger, Equity Champion, Resource Optimiser, and Inclusive Mobiliser. We propose a framework to consider these archetypes relationally along the dimensions of ‘orientation’ (system | people) and ‘approach’ (incremental | transformative). We discuss the implications of our findings, highlighting their potential in diverse, pluralistic decision-making environments characteristic of mobility and transport planning. Our study contributes a framework and conceptual repertoire of archetypes to support constructive decision-making in complex contexts.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 145
Torrington Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
British Academy
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.