Ending international fossil fuel finance: Lessons from the Clean Energy Transition Partnership

This brief analysis examines the Clean Energy Transition Partnership (CETP) established at COP26, which aims to end public finance for international fossil fuel projects. While the CETP has corresponded with a reduction in foreign fossil fuel investment from its signatories, we argue that the partnership maintains key shortcomings, including the continuity of massive domestic fossil fuel subsidies within wealthy signatory countries. Using Australia as the stand-out example, our analysis highlights the paradoxical nature of this situation, and concludes by advocating for the CETP to include the elimination of domestic finance in its remit to ensure a genuine commitment to a global clean energy transition. • Analyses the CETP's effectiveness in reducing fossil fuel financing. • Identifies gaps between international commitments and domestic subsidies. • Highlights Australia's role in undermining CETP's climate leadership claims. • Recommends ending domestic fossil fuel subsidies to enhance CETP credibility. • Advocates for stronger compliance mechanisms for CETP accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114694
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ending international fossil fuel finance: Lessons from the Clean Energy Transition Partnership

Bryce Morgan, Robert MacNeil
Energy Policy
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Ending international fossil fuel finance: Lessons from the Clean Energy Transition Partnership

Bryce Morgan, Robert MacNeil
article en

Abstract

This brief analysis examines the Clean Energy Transition Partnership (CETP) established at COP26, which aims to end public finance for international fossil fuel projects. While the CETP has corresponded with a reduction in foreign fossil fuel investment from its signatories, we argue that the partnership maintains key shortcomings, including the continuity of massive domestic fossil fuel subsidies within wealthy signatory countries. Using Australia as the stand-out example, our analysis highlights the paradoxical nature of this situation, and concludes by advocating for the CETP to include the elimination of domestic finance in its remit to ensure a genuine commitment to a global clean energy transition. • Analyses the CETP's effectiveness in reducing fossil fuel financing. • Identifies gaps between international commitments and domestic subsidies. • Highlights Australia's role in undermining CETP's climate leadership claims. • Recommends ending domestic fossil fuel subsidies to enhance CETP credibility. • Advocates for stronger compliance mechanisms for CETP accountability.

Energy PolicyVol. 204
The University of Sydney (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.