Hybrid principal component analysis and artificial neural networks method to improve the seismic response prediction

Seismic vulnerability assessment is crucial for ensuring the structural safety of buildings, particularly in earthquake-prone regions. While Nonlinear Time History Analysis (NLTHA) provides high accuracy, its computational demands make it impractical for rapid assessments. Machine learning (ML) models, especially Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), offer an efficient alternative but often require large datasets for reliable predictions. This study introduces a hybrid Principal Component Analysis-Artificial Neural Network (PCA-ANN) model to enhance seismic response prediction by reducing input dimensionality while preserving critical information. A dataset of over one million seismic responses was generated using NLTHA on three reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings subjected to various ground motions. Comparative analysis between PCA-ANN and conventional ANN models reveals that PCA-ANN significantly improves both predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. The PCA-ANN model achieved a correlation coefficient (R 2 ) of 99.1% and reduced Mean Squared Error (MSE) by 87% compared to the standalone ANN. Additionally, PCA-ANN maintained robust performance with limited dataset sizes, achieving an R 2 above 75% using only 25% of the dataset, whereas ANN failed under similar conditions. Further validation through Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) and fragility curves shows that PCA-ANN exhibits discrepancies below 2% compared to NLTHA. The model also achieves the lowest Relative Squared Error (RSR) (18%, 21%, and 24% for low-, mid-, and high-rise buildings, respectively) and the lowest Percentage Bias (PBias) (1.7%, 0.5%, and 0.3% for the same building types) when utilizing the full dataset. These results highlight PCA-ANN’s superior reliability across varying structural heights and dataset sizes. This study demonstrates that PCA-ANN is an efficient and accurate tool for seismic risk assessment, reducing computational costs while maintaining predictive reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Structural Engineering
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332251340733
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid principal component analysis and artificial neural networks method to improve the seismic response prediction

Benbokhari Abdellatif, Benazouz Chikh, Ahmed Mébarki
2 citations
Advances in Structural Engineering
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
4.96
article

Hybrid principal component analysis and artificial neural networks method to improve the seismic response prediction

Benbokhari Abdellatif, Benazouz Chikh, Ahmed Mébarki
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Seismic vulnerability assessment is crucial for ensuring the structural safety of buildings, particularly in earthquake-prone regions. While Nonlinear Time History Analysis (NLTHA) provides high accuracy, its computational demands make it impractical for rapid assessments. Machine learning (ML) models, especially Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), offer an efficient alternative but often require large datasets for reliable predictions. This study introduces a hybrid Principal Component Analysis-Artificial Neural Network (PCA-ANN) model to enhance seismic response prediction by reducing input dimensionality while preserving critical information. A dataset of over one million seismic responses was generated using NLTHA on three reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings subjected to various ground motions. Comparative analysis between PCA-ANN and conventional ANN models reveals that PCA-ANN significantly improves both predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. The PCA-ANN model achieved a correlation coefficient (R 2 ) of 99.1% and reduced Mean Squared Error (MSE) by 87% compared to the standalone ANN. Additionally, PCA-ANN maintained robust performance with limited dataset sizes, achieving an R 2 above 75% using only 25% of the dataset, whereas ANN failed under similar conditions. Further validation through Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) and fragility curves shows that PCA-ANN exhibits discrepancies below 2% compared to NLTHA. The model also achieves the lowest Relative Squared Error (RSR) (18%, 21%, and 24% for low-, mid-, and high-rise buildings, respectively) and the lowest Percentage Bias (PBias) (1.7%, 0.5%, and 0.3% for the same building types) when utilizing the full dataset. These results highlight PCA-ANN’s superior reliability across varying structural heights and dataset sizes. This study demonstrates that PCA-ANN is an efficient and accurate tool for seismic risk assessment, reducing computational costs while maintaining predictive reliability.

Advances in Structural EngineeringVol. 28(16)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Nanjing Tech University (CN), National Advanced School of Public Works (CM), École Nationale Supérieure de Technologie (DZ), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Laboratoire Modélisation et Simulation Multi-Echelle (FR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.