Mercy and International Criminal Justice

Abstract The idea of being merciful to those convicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) is uncomfortable. International criminal law (ICL) aims to address the most serious forms of harms inflicted by people on others, holding those responsible accountable through punishment. Given this, being merciful to perpetrators — treating them with kindness, compassion and leniency, particularly in punishment — seems inappropriate. The acceptability of mercy in the domestic context suggests it is worthwhile to think harder about whether there are possible justifications for mercy for perpetrators of international crimes. This article suggests that mercy has a role in ensuring perpetrators are treated as fellow human beings and in properly accounting for their individual circumstances. While the question of what role there should be for mercy in ICL is worth asking for its own sake, it also helps clarify the ways in which ICL differs from its domestic counterpart in its processes, purposes and rationale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaf012
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mercy and International Criminal Justice

Simon McKenzie
Journal of International Criminal Justice
International Law and Human Rights
article

Mercy and International Criminal Justice

Simon McKenzie
article en

Abstract

Abstract The idea of being merciful to those convicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) is uncomfortable. International criminal law (ICL) aims to address the most serious forms of harms inflicted by people on others, holding those responsible accountable through punishment. Given this, being merciful to perpetrators — treating them with kindness, compassion and leniency, particularly in punishment — seems inappropriate. The acceptability of mercy in the domestic context suggests it is worthwhile to think harder about whether there are possible justifications for mercy for perpetrators of international crimes. This article suggests that mercy has a role in ensuring perpetrators are treated as fellow human beings and in properly accounting for their individual circumstances. While the question of what role there should be for mercy in ICL is worth asking for its own sake, it also helps clarify the ways in which ICL differs from its domestic counterpart in its processes, purposes and rationale.

Journal of International Criminal JusticeVol. 23(2)
Griffith University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mercy and International Criminal Justice — Simon McKenzie · Journal of International Criminal Justice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS