Towards transformative change for biodiversity: What can we learn from case studies in Germany?

Current human activities have led to fundamental changes in ecosystems, including the loss of biodiversity, which increasingly leads to irreversible negative impacts on society. Although called for in many policy documents, the debate on how to initiate, promote and specifically support socio-ecological transformations for the conservation and restoration of biodiversity is still in its early stages. So far, efforts to protect biodiversity were only partially successful. Therefore, there is a need for approaches to promote societal change for the benefit of biodiversity. We analysed 22 case studies of biodiversity-enhancing societal processes and projects in Germany to understand barriers and success factors and to identify features that support transformative change towards sustainability and biodiversity mainstreaming. Following Wittmer et al. (2021), the following topics were analysed: a) orientation towards a shared and compelling vision that enables biodiversity conservation or enhancement (transformative vision), b) the role of (different types of) knowledge about how to change the system (transformative knowledge), c) navigating the dynamics inherent in changing development pathways (transformational dynamics), d) enabling emancipated action and opening spaces for creative participation of different social groups (emancipation and agency), and e) targeted interventions that aim to enable governance for transformation. This article discusses lessons learned from examples in Germany to support future transformative processes for biodiversity conservation, restoration and biodiversity mainstreaming. It identifies 16 features, enabling transformative change for biodiversity, many of which may be applicable in other countries with similar governance contexts. These characteristics suggest that a structured and well-informed approach, based on a broad range of communication, engagement, negotiation, and stakeholder involvement efforts throughout the process, is well-suited for developing and implementing proposals. While in some small cases indirect drivers were addressed, achieving this on a broader scale is the largest remaining challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125663
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards transformative change for biodiversity: What can we learn from case studies in Germany?

Janina Kleemann, Tanja Sanders, Christine Fürst, Christian Schleyer et al.
1 links
Journal of Environmental Management
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Towards transformative change for biodiversity: What can we learn from case studies in Germany?

Janina Kleemann, Tanja Sanders, Christine Fürst, Christian Schleyer, Christian Albert, Thilo Wellmann, Dagmar Haase, Jennifer Hauck, Stefan Knauß, Vera Schreiner, Pia Sommer, Karsten Grunewald, Sonja C. Jähnig, Christian Poßer, Heidi Wittmer, Josef Kaiser, Thomas Potthast, Marion Mehring, Monika Egerer, Johannes Müller, Peter Keil
article en

Abstract

Current human activities have led to fundamental changes in ecosystems, including the loss of biodiversity, which increasingly leads to irreversible negative impacts on society. Although called for in many policy documents, the debate on how to initiate, promote and specifically support socio-ecological transformations for the conservation and restoration of biodiversity is still in its early stages. So far, efforts to protect biodiversity were only partially successful. Therefore, there is a need for approaches to promote societal change for the benefit of biodiversity. We analysed 22 case studies of biodiversity-enhancing societal processes and projects in Germany to understand barriers and success factors and to identify features that support transformative change towards sustainability and biodiversity mainstreaming. Following Wittmer et al. (2021), the following topics were analysed: a) orientation towards a shared and compelling vision that enables biodiversity conservation or enhancement (transformative vision), b) the role of (different types of) knowledge about how to change the system (transformative knowledge), c) navigating the dynamics inherent in changing development pathways (transformational dynamics), d) enabling emancipated action and opening spaces for creative participation of different social groups (emancipation and agency), and e) targeted interventions that aim to enable governance for transformation. This article discusses lessons learned from examples in Germany to support future transformative processes for biodiversity conservation, restoration and biodiversity mainstreaming. It identifies 16 features, enabling transformative change for biodiversity, many of which may be applicable in other countries with similar governance contexts. These characteristics suggest that a structured and well-informed approach, based on a broad range of communication, engagement, negotiation, and stakeholder involvement efforts throughout the process, is well-suited for developing and implementing proposals. While in some small cases indirect drivers were addressed, achieving this on a broader scale is the largest remaining challenge.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 386
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Universität Innsbruck (AT), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Institute of Forest Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University of Applied Sciences Erfurt (DE), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE), Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (DE), Adipositas Zentrum Oberhausen (DE), BH Consulting (Ireland) (IE), University of Rostock (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.