Effective coverage of childbirths in health facilities in Nepal: cross-sectional study combining Demographic and Health Survey 2022 and Health Facility Survey 2021

Background Crude intervention coverage, such as percentage of facility-based childbirths, does not reflect care quality. Effective coverage provides a more accurate measure by accounting for the quality of maternal health services. This study aimed to estimate effective coverage of facility-based childbirth in enabling environments in Nepal. Methods We used data from Nepal’s Demographic and Health Survey 2022 including 1,977 women and the Health Facility Survey 2021 with a sample of 804 facilities. We calculated the percentages of births by facility type and the percentage of facility types with enabling environments for childbirth services. We combined the results from two surveys to estimate effective coverage of births for routine childbirth, basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC and CEmONC). Results Around 80 % of all births occurred in health facilities nationwide. This reduced to 18.5% nationwide when only births in facilities equipped for routine childbirth were considered, and further to 12.9% and 12.2%, respectively for BEmONC and CEmONC. The reduction between crude and effective coverage across facility types varied from 36.8% to 13.5% in government hospitals, from 16.1% to 4.7% in private hospitals for routine childbirth. While, 20.1% of births were in health posts, no health posts had enabling environments for routine childbirth. Conclusions Fewer than one in five births occur in health facilities with enabling environments for acceptable quality care. This emphasizes the need for policymakers to prioritize the quality of childbirth services in well-equipped and well-staffed facility environments to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52872/001c.137643
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective coverage of childbirths in health facilities in Nepal: cross-sectional study combining Demographic and Health Survey 2022 and Health Facility Survey 2021

Emma Radovich, Loveday Penn‐Kekana, Aline Semaan, Ann‐Beth Moller et al.
Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Effective coverage of childbirths in health facilities in Nepal: cross-sectional study combining Demographic and Health Survey 2022 and Health Facility Survey 2021

Emma Radovich, Loveday Penn‐Kekana, Aline Semaan, Ann‐Beth Moller, Erica Yarmol-Matusiak, Yao He, Laith Hussain‐Alkhateeb, Lenka Beňová, Seema Das, Sulata Karki
article en

Abstract

Background Crude intervention coverage, such as percentage of facility-based childbirths, does not reflect care quality. Effective coverage provides a more accurate measure by accounting for the quality of maternal health services. This study aimed to estimate effective coverage of facility-based childbirth in enabling environments in Nepal. Methods We used data from Nepal’s Demographic and Health Survey 2022 including 1,977 women and the Health Facility Survey 2021 with a sample of 804 facilities. We calculated the percentages of births by facility type and the percentage of facility types with enabling environments for childbirth services. We combined the results from two surveys to estimate effective coverage of births for routine childbirth, basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC and CEmONC). Results Around 80 % of all births occurred in health facilities nationwide. This reduced to 18.5% nationwide when only births in facilities equipped for routine childbirth were considered, and further to 12.9% and 12.2%, respectively for BEmONC and CEmONC. The reduction between crude and effective coverage across facility types varied from 36.8% to 13.5% in government hospitals, from 16.1% to 4.7% in private hospitals for routine childbirth. While, 20.1% of births were in health posts, no health posts had enabling environments for routine childbirth. Conclusions Fewer than one in five births occur in health facilities with enabling environments for acceptable quality care. This emphasizes the need for policymakers to prioritize the quality of childbirth services in well-equipped and well-staffed facility environments to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Journal of Global Health Economics and PolicyVol. 5
Gates (United States) (US), Emory University (US), Research Institute for Tropical Medicine (PH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), BIO Ventures for Global Health (US), University of Gothenburg (SE)
United States Agency for International Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.