Indecision under time pressure arises from suboptimal switching behavior

Indecisive behavior can be catastrophic, leading to car crashes or stock market losses. Despite fruitful efforts across several decades to understand decision making, there has been little research on what leads to indecision. Here, we examined how indecisions arise under high-pressure deadlines. In our first experiment, participants attempted to select a target by either reacting to a stimulus or guessing, when acting under a high-pressure time constraint. We found that participants were suboptimal, displaying a below chance win percentage due to an excessive number of indecisions. Computational modeling suggested that participants were excessively indecisive because they failed to account for a time delay and temporal uncertainty when switching from reacting to guessing, a phenomenon previously unreported in the literature. In a follow-up experiment, we provide direct evidence for a functionally relevant time delay and temporal uncertainty when switching from reacting to guessing. Collectively, our results indicate that participants failed to account for a time delay and temporal uncertainty associated with switching from reacting to guessing, leading to suboptimal and indecisive behavior.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Indecisive behavior is highly prevalent in many aspects of daily life. Despite its ubiquity, there has been very little focus and a lack of explanation for why indecisions occur. Here, we find under high time pressure scenarios that indecisions arise by misrepresenting additional time delays and temporal uncertainties associated when attempting to switch from reacting to guessing. Our novel paradigm presents a new way to elucidate and study indecisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00563.2024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indecision under time pressure arises from suboptimal switching behavior

Joshua G. A. Cashaback, Adam M. Roth, Christopher Peters, John Buggeln et al.
2 citations
Journal of Neurophysiology
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
4.54
article

Indecision under time pressure arises from suboptimal switching behavior

Joshua G. A. Cashaback, Adam M. Roth, Christopher Peters, John Buggeln, Isaac Kurtzer, Jan A. Calalo, Rakshith Lokesh, Seth R. Sullivan, Michael J Carter, Truc Ngo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Indecisive behavior can be catastrophic, leading to car crashes or stock market losses. Despite fruitful efforts across several decades to understand decision making, there has been little research on what leads to indecision. Here, we examined how indecisions arise under high-pressure deadlines. In our first experiment, participants attempted to select a target by either reacting to a stimulus or guessing, when acting under a high-pressure time constraint. We found that participants were suboptimal, displaying a below chance win percentage due to an excessive number of indecisions. Computational modeling suggested that participants were excessively indecisive because they failed to account for a time delay and temporal uncertainty when switching from reacting to guessing, a phenomenon previously unreported in the literature. In a follow-up experiment, we provide direct evidence for a functionally relevant time delay and temporal uncertainty when switching from reacting to guessing. Collectively, our results indicate that participants failed to account for a time delay and temporal uncertainty associated with switching from reacting to guessing, leading to suboptimal and indecisive behavior.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Indecisive behavior is highly prevalent in many aspects of daily life. Despite its ubiquity, there has been very little focus and a lack of explanation for why indecisions occur. Here, we find under high time pressure scenarios that indecisions arise by misrepresenting additional time delays and temporal uncertainties associated when attempting to switch from reacting to guessing. Our novel paradigm presents a new way to elucidate and study indecisions.

Journal of NeurophysiologyVol. 134(1)
University of Delaware (US), Universidad del Noreste (MX), McMaster University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
4.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.