Defined approaches to predict GHS and EPA classifications for ocular irritation potential of agrochemical formulations

Instead of evaluating direct concordance of the four individual DAs with historical in vivo rabbit eye test data, for each formulation, we assessed orthogonal concordance of GHS and EPA classifications predicted across all five approaches. Predictions were considered orthogonally concordant when they aligned with the prediction of at least two other approaches (i.e. a majority, or at least 3 of the 5 approaches, achieved the same prediction), referred to as the 'majority prediction.' We also evaluated hazard labeling and PPE labeling associated with the GHS and EPA predictions, respectively. Relative to the hazard and PPE labeling associated with the majority predictions, each of the four DAs were as, or more, protective of human health than the rabbit test; hence, we conclude that these DAs can be used to predict the GHS and EPA classifications of agrochemical formulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2025.2499552
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defined approaches to predict GHS and EPA classifications for ocular irritation potential of agrochemical formulations

Emily N. Reinke, Neepa Choksi, David Allen, Amy J. Clippinger et al.
1 citations
Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
Animal testing and alternatives
2.35
article

Defined approaches to predict GHS and EPA classifications for ocular irritation potential of agrochemical formulations

Emily N. Reinke, Neepa Choksi, David Allen, Amy J. Clippinger, Amber B. Daniel, Anna J. van der Zalm, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Hans Raabe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Instead of evaluating direct concordance of the four individual DAs with historical in vivo rabbit eye test data, for each formulation, we assessed orthogonal concordance of GHS and EPA classifications predicted across all five approaches. Predictions were considered orthogonally concordant when they aligned with the prediction of at least two other approaches (i.e. a majority, or at least 3 of the 5 approaches, achieved the same prediction), referred to as the 'majority prediction.' We also evaluated hazard labeling and PPE labeling associated with the GHS and EPA predictions, respectively. Relative to the hazard and PPE labeling associated with the majority predictions, each of the four DAs were as, or more, protective of human health than the rabbit test; hence, we conclude that these DAs can be used to predict the GHS and EPA classifications of agrochemical formulations.

Cutaneous and Ocular ToxicologyVol. 44(3)
Research Triangle Park Foundation (US), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US), Institute for In Vitro Sciences (US)
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Animal testing and alternatives
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defined approaches to predict GHS and EPA classifications for ocular irritation potential of agrochemical formulations — Emily N. Reinke, Neepa Choksi, et al. · Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS