Outcomes Following Colectomy at For-Profit Hospitals: A National Analysis

BackgroundOne of the most commonly performed operations in the US, colectomy remains associated with a substantial incidence of postoperative complications. While there is increasing recognition that hospital for-profit financial structure may be linked with variation in morbidity, the impact of care at for-profit (FP) hospitals on outcomes following colectomy remains to be elucidated.MethodsAll adults undergoing elective/emergent colectomy for diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, benign colonic neoplasms, or colon cancer, ≤2days of admission, were tabulated from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by care at FP centers into the FP and Non-FP cohorts. Following entropy balancing, multivariable models were developed to consider the independent association of FP status with key outcomes.ResultsOf ∼1,130,803 admissions for colectomy, 862 495 (76.3%) were elective. Among electively admitted patients, 74 933 (8.7%) were grouped as FP. After risk adjustment, care at FP institutions was associated with greater odds of major morbidity (AOR 1.27, CI 1.22-1.32), non-home discharge (AOR 1.20, CI 1.13-1.27), and non-elective readmission (AOR 1.26, CI 1.12-1.32), but lower per-patient expenditures (β-$2430/patient, CI -2,860, -2010). Considering the 268 308 emergent cases, 38 568 (14.4%) were managed at FP hospitals. Following multivariable adjustment, treatment at FP hospitals remained associated with increased morbidity (AOR 1.16, CI 1.11-1.21) and decreased costs (β-$5,630, CI -6,210, -5,050).DiscussionUndergoing colectomy at FP hospitals was associated with greater complications and readmissions, but reduced per-patient expenditures. Future research should consider the factors contributing to inferior clinical outcomes at these centers. Best practices should be shared across institutions, irrespective of financial structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251337162
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stoma care and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes Following Colectomy at For-Profit Hospitals: A National Analysis

Peyman Benharash, Hanjoo Lee, Esteban Aguayo, Amulya Vadlakonda et al.
1 citations
The American Surgeon
Stoma care and complications
2.01
article

Outcomes Following Colectomy at For-Profit Hospitals: A National Analysis

Peyman Benharash, Hanjoo Lee, Esteban Aguayo, Amulya Vadlakonda, Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar, Sara Sakowitz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundOne of the most commonly performed operations in the US, colectomy remains associated with a substantial incidence of postoperative complications. While there is increasing recognition that hospital for-profit financial structure may be linked with variation in morbidity, the impact of care at for-profit (FP) hospitals on outcomes following colectomy remains to be elucidated.MethodsAll adults undergoing elective/emergent colectomy for diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, benign colonic neoplasms, or colon cancer, ≤2days of admission, were tabulated from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by care at FP centers into the FP and Non-FP cohorts. Following entropy balancing, multivariable models were developed to consider the independent association of FP status with key outcomes.ResultsOf ∼1,130,803 admissions for colectomy, 862 495 (76.3%) were elective. Among electively admitted patients, 74 933 (8.7%) were grouped as FP. After risk adjustment, care at FP institutions was associated with greater odds of major morbidity (AOR 1.27, CI 1.22-1.32), non-home discharge (AOR 1.20, CI 1.13-1.27), and non-elective readmission (AOR 1.26, CI 1.12-1.32), but lower per-patient expenditures (β-$2430/patient, CI -2,860, -2010). Considering the 268 308 emergent cases, 38 568 (14.4%) were managed at FP hospitals. Following multivariable adjustment, treatment at FP hospitals remained associated with increased morbidity (AOR 1.16, CI 1.11-1.21) and decreased costs (β-$5,630, CI -6,210, -5,050).DiscussionUndergoing colectomy at FP hospitals was associated with greater complications and readmissions, but reduced per-patient expenditures. Future research should consider the factors contributing to inferior clinical outcomes at these centers. Best practices should be shared across institutions, irrespective of financial structure.

The American SurgeonVol. 91(10)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Stoma care and complications
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.