Effectiveness of Janda’s Approach Versus Comprehensive Corrective Exercise Program on Posture and Muscle Imbalance in Individuals with Upper Crossed Syndrome

Background: Upper Crossed Syndrome (UCS) is a common postural imbalance caused by muscle dysfunction in the upper body. Objective: This study compared the effectiveness of Janda’s Approach and a Comprehensive Corrective Exercise Program (CCEP) in individuals with UCS. Methods: A total of 30 participants with UCS were randomly divided into Group A (Janda’s Approach) and Group B (CCEP). Interventions were administered 5 days/week for 6 weeks. Outcome measures included the Targus-to-Wall Test (TWT), Scapular Index (SI), Pectoralis Minor Index (PMI), and Neck Flexor Strength (NFS). Results: Both groups showed significant improvement; however, Group A (Janda’s Approach) demonstrated statistically greater improvements (p<0.01) across all parameters. Conclusion: Janda’s Approach is more effective than CCEP in correcting posture and muscle imbalance in individuals with UCS. Key words: Upper Crossed Syndrome, Janda’s Approach, Comprehensive Corrective Exercise Program, Posture, Muscle Imbalance