Právní regulace venčení psů ve vybraných evropských zemích

This article focuses on the legal regulation of off-leash and muzzle-free dog walking in public spaces in municipalities in five European countries, namely Czechia, Slovakia, Poland, France, and Germany (specifically Berlin, North Rhine-Westphalia, Saxony-Anhalt). It compares the degree of centralization in rulemaking, approaches to dangerous and assistance dogs, and the content of regulations. The comparison shows that in Czechia, Poland, and Slovakia, the rules are mainly contained in municipal ordinances issued by local representative bodies. In contrast, France supplements statutory rules by granting mayors broad discretionary powers. German legislation varies among the federal states, and the article highlights North Rhine-Westphalia for providing a satisfactory minimum level of protection (which, however, could be even higher). Slovakia, France, and Germany also have specific regulations on dangerous dogs, unlike Czechia and Poland. Furthermore, Czechia is the only country that does not set exemptions for assistance dogs, thus creating room for discrimination against people with disabilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurisprudence
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71372/qsum6946
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Právní regulace venčení psů ve vybraných evropských zemích

T Florian
Jurisprudence
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

Právní regulace venčení psů ve vybraných evropských zemích

T Florian
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on the legal regulation of off-leash and muzzle-free dog walking in public spaces in municipalities in five European countries, namely Czechia, Slovakia, Poland, France, and Germany (specifically Berlin, North Rhine-Westphalia, Saxony-Anhalt). It compares the degree of centralization in rulemaking, approaches to dangerous and assistance dogs, and the content of regulations. The comparison shows that in Czechia, Poland, and Slovakia, the rules are mainly contained in municipal ordinances issued by local representative bodies. In contrast, France supplements statutory rules by granting mayors broad discretionary powers. German legislation varies among the federal states, and the article highlights North Rhine-Westphalia for providing a satisfactory minimum level of protection (which, however, could be even higher). Slovakia, France, and Germany also have specific regulations on dangerous dogs, unlike Czechia and Poland. Furthermore, Czechia is the only country that does not set exemptions for assistance dogs, thus creating room for discrimination against people with disabilities.

JurisprudenceVol. 1/2025
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.