Platforms on the hook? EU and human rights requirements for human involvement in content moderation

Abstract This article explores the human rights standards relevant to ensuring human involvement requirements in EU legislation related to automated content moderation. The opinions given by different experts and human rights bodies emphasise the human rights relevance of the way in which platforms distribute automated and human moderators in their services. EU secondary legislation establishes basic requirements for these structures that are called to be read under a human rights perspective. This article examines the justifications given for incorporating human involvement in content moderation, the different types of human involvement in content moderation, and the specific requirements for such involvement under EU secondary law. Additionally, it analyses the human rights principles concerning procedural safeguards for freedom of expression within this legal framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Forum on AI Law and Governance
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2025.3
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platforms on the hook? EU and human rights requirements for human involvement in content moderation

Emmanuel Vargas Penagos
Cambridge Forum on AI Law and Governance
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Platforms on the hook? EU and human rights requirements for human involvement in content moderation

Emmanuel Vargas Penagos
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the human rights standards relevant to ensuring human involvement requirements in EU legislation related to automated content moderation. The opinions given by different experts and human rights bodies emphasise the human rights relevance of the way in which platforms distribute automated and human moderators in their services. EU secondary legislation establishes basic requirements for these structures that are called to be read under a human rights perspective. This article examines the justifications given for incorporating human involvement in content moderation, the different types of human involvement in content moderation, and the specific requirements for such involvement under EU secondary law. Additionally, it analyses the human rights principles concerning procedural safeguards for freedom of expression within this legal framework.

Cambridge Forum on AI Law and GovernanceVol. 1
Örebro University (SE)
Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.