Innovative Design of an Augmented Reality Device for Anesthesia: User Insights and Usability Evaluation

Patient care involves multiple healthcare professionals and carries inherent risks. Addressing human factors is essential to mitigating these risks and improving professional practices. Cognitive aids are one strategy to standardize tasks based on clinical guidelines. A multidisciplinary team, consisting of anesthesiologists, pharmacists, ergonomists, and engineers, aimed to design an innovative device to facilitate cognitive aid usage. The initial phase of the project involved evaluating the usability and utility of a prototype: augmented reality eyewear controlled by voice commands. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), alongside semi-structured interviews conducted between July and August. A pharmacy resident conducted 13 interviews with anesthesiologists recruited from three hospitals within the Lille University Hospital Center, using a nine-question guide developed with an ergonomist. Interviews averaged 35.9 minutes (±10.4), and the average SUS score was 72.5 (±15.6). The prototype was generally well received, with participants suggesting the integration of cognitive aids for emergency situations. However, despite positive feedback on the concept, the format of the prototype was not favored. Ergonomic feedback will guide further device improvements, and additional research on technology adoption is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250332
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative Design of an Augmented Reality Device for Anesthesia: User Insights and Usability Evaluation

Romaric Marcilly, Slim Hammadi, Mathieu Jeanne, Bertrand Décaudin et al.
Studies in health technology and informatics
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Innovative Design of an Augmented Reality Device for Anesthesia: User Insights and Usability Evaluation

Romaric Marcilly, Slim Hammadi, Mathieu Jeanne, Bertrand Décaudin, Gilles Lebuffe, Pascal Odou, Fernando M. Nunes, Sarah Ben Othman, Arthur Lecoutre, Honoré Guise
article en

Abstract

Patient care involves multiple healthcare professionals and carries inherent risks. Addressing human factors is essential to mitigating these risks and improving professional practices. Cognitive aids are one strategy to standardize tasks based on clinical guidelines. A multidisciplinary team, consisting of anesthesiologists, pharmacists, ergonomists, and engineers, aimed to design an innovative device to facilitate cognitive aid usage. The initial phase of the project involved evaluating the usability and utility of a prototype: augmented reality eyewear controlled by voice commands. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), alongside semi-structured interviews conducted between July and August. A pharmacy resident conducted 13 interviews with anesthesiologists recruited from three hospitals within the Lille University Hospital Center, using a nine-question guide developed with an ergonomist. Interviews averaged 35.9 minutes (±10.4), and the average SUS score was 72.5 (±15.6). The prototype was generally well received, with participants suggesting the integration of cognitive aids for emergency situations. However, despite positive feedback on the concept, the format of the prototype was not favored. Ergonomic feedback will guide further device improvements, and additional research on technology adoption is required.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 327
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Université de Lille (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Innovation Technologique (FR), École Centrale de Lille (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.